Admiral777

Currently 5Q0411105DQ. But I'm interested in the following, without reference to the car model. 5Q0411105DQ (height 326 mm, thickness 13.5 mm), 5Q0411105DR (height 323 mm, thickness 13.9-13.7 mm, characteristics are established by actual measurement, manufacturer data could not be found). At the same time, the analogue for both springs is SUPLEX 39686 https://www.autodoc.de/suplex/20493476 (height 326 mm, thickness 13.8 mm). Now the questions: which of the springs (5Q0411105DQ or 5Q0411105DR) will give more ground clearance? will SUPLEX 39686 be better than both springs, or are analogues made from such materials that, despite the stated dimensions, they ultimately correspond to the performance of the original?

Hello Carlston! Time passes, but the problems remain the same) I need your help again. Can I count on you?

I just did the reverse procedure) Can the springs sag a little, especially at first?

No, I changed the front springs, 5Q0411105HS to 5Q0411105DQ.

The first photo is of the rear arch. What to do? May be, https://www.autodoc.co.uk/eibach/13828886 because it is still 4 mm longer.

Hello dear Carlston! I installed the front springs, now this is the situation: the front is higher than the back.

I'll show you a photo soon)

You seem to be a very competent specialist, so I think I will put these springs. As they say on the TV show, don't switch)

The fact of the matter is that the diameter of the wire is 13.5, and one of the springs weighs 2.16 kg.

The springs were ordered from an official Skoda dealer, a manufacturer of VAG. Given the variation in weight, is it worth installing them?

Hello, dear Carlston! The springs 5Q0411105DQ I ordered have arrived. The inspection carried out found that the parameters of the springs correspond to the declared ones, except for the weight. Spring weight 2.160 and 2.190 kg instead of 2.3. What to do? Is it permissible deviations between the springs and both springs from the set value?

You know, Carlston, I will. I will weigh and measure. Perhaps this is where the root of the problem lies. But now, thanks to you, I can speak the same language with service workers)

https://www.autodoc.co.uk/eibach/13828886 4mm longer than 5Q0511115AN and I thought the length could compensate for the stiffness in case of hauling a load. Is not it so?

Мне кажется, если подбирать пружины, то, что вы сказали, то лучше всего, чтобы это была продукция одного производителя. Кроме того, они должны быть примерно в том же состоянии физических характеристик, что и исходные, с этой возможностью увеличить клиренс. Я думаю, что они будут: https://www.autodoc.co.uk/eibach/13829054 https://www.autodoc.co.uk/eibach/13828886 Carlston, did I draw the right conclusions? Am I on the right track?))

Maybe do the same with the front?

I am very grateful to you for your assistance and for your professionalism and patience. You helped me a lot.

5Q0411105HR instead of 5Q0411115DR?

I compared with 5Q0511115AN. And I wanted to know how do you think the rear mounted Eibach 10494 would fit with the front mounted 5Q0411105DR.

But the stiffness of the spring will allow you to maintain the same handling? There will be no buildup?

The Eibach R10494 has 1 turn (8.8 vs 7.8) more and is 4mm longer. Will this somehow affect the height of the rear of the car when installed with springs 5Q0411105DR?

Will it continue only at the moment of contact with the unevenness? Will the car straighten out after driving over bumps?

What about this: https://www.autodoc.co.uk/eibach/13828886 ?

And what rear springs can you recommend for installation with 5Q0411105DR?

Ты был прав, как всегда. Это подшипники от А5 и от А7. Пружины действительно не подходят.