arbs
Members-
Posts
248 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
Car Info
-
Model
2010 TSi vRS Candy White
arbs's Achievements
-
No worries, completely my fault for not keepin an eye on the forum!
-
Yeah, plus one! Not been on the forum for some time, came to have a look here for group buy potential and blood missed it! I gather there were no drop outs and all the spaces were filled?
-
To be honest I've read this thread, and am not sure that you should be saying Superskoda is rubbish... Surely it should be Superskoda are rubbish
-
Shark Performance STS group buy - get your FREE STS here
arbs replied to shark_90's topic in Group Buys
Sounds great, where are the map prices please - will this work with the Octravia FL TSI? Editr - just seen above re 2010 cars - does this apply to 2010 petrols as well as diesels? And if the ECU does have to come out to be tuned does this mean that both maps can not be loaded onto the STS? -
Nowt to do with blinkers, personally I enjoy the handling of the Octy over the Focus tho. Don't get me wrong, I loved my ST, it's a fantastic allrounder but I'd consider it more of a 'GT' than an out and out hot hatch (not that I would consider the vRS a hot hatch either) I found with the Focus, the engine dominated the experience - both in a good way, with the noise/power/torque, but in a not so good way with what seemed like a bit of a noise heavy trait when you were pushing on. On the road in day to day driving this wasnt really an issue but on the track it resulted in a lot of roll and understeer (on standard suspension at least). Incidentally I think most publications would rate the Golf mk5 GTi to be a more fun/better handler than the ST tho the Octavia rarely features in the grouptests. I've also had a lot of experience of the GTI too and find the experience with the vRS to be pretty similar; i.e. a sharper turn in (IMO), and an eagerness to change direction with precision that feels more muted in the ST (IMO). Yes - you notice the extra bulk of the vRS over the GTi, but overall they're very similar in their handling traits.
-
I' ve owned a ST for a couple of years, tbh I'm surprised people think the ST handles better, tho it depends how you define 'better'. I'd say the vRS feels more agile than the ST IMO. As for the OP I think a remapped vRS would be about on par, maybe VERY slightly quicker than the ST. However if i ever owned another ST it wouldn't last a day without being mapped (dreamscience) - it completely transforms it!
-
electric folding mirrors... not on my vrs?
arbs replied to mbzvrs's topic in Skoda Octavia Mk II (2004 - 2013)
how hard would they be to retrofit? -
nice - $80!
-
genius!
-
isnt it something to do with some new EU directive or something? I must admit they are a bit intrusive on the a pillar view but do give excellent vision!
-
excellent. am i correct in saying there is no protection for front an rear tho? ordered a third party jobbie for my '4 which arrives next week (on three network) just in case.
-
Greetings, I'm in 'arlow
-
£10 insurance when car in dealer for warranty work
arbs replied to jamestay1's topic in Skoda Fabia Mk II (2007-2014)
to be honest i don't think there is any entitlement to a courtesy car at all so if you want it, its at their terms! -
Hmmm, so the rears are defo adjustable as well then? Do most have adjustable damping rates too? does it effect both compression and rebound or just the rebound? Wonder if the manufactures could tell me how the standard ride height compares to the 'highest setting??
-
i must add - 40mpg is not typical for me - just really impressed its possible without toooo much effort! In the 2500 miles I've done so far i think its averaging around 33mpg which I'm still hugely happy with. i tend to do more longer runs than town stuff tho.