Jump to content

Krooked

Members
  • Posts

    243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Cheshire

Car Info

  • Model
    2018 Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG 4x4 Edition (on order)

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Krooked's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/17)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

6

Reputation

  1. First world problem I know.! I don't see many Moon white Edition's on the road so I am basically making my purchase decision based upon YouTube Video. I even order the Black Triglav's to get the look. However, I have seen the Quartz Greys and the do look very sophisticated in that colour. Obviously they are more popular for a reason and do suit the car well especially with the beige interior. So I've got a week to confirm with dealer before it's too late to make any changes to the spec. I'm planning to keep the car 4 yrs and tbh Im not one to be out cleaning it every weekend.. Given the above what would most ppl on this forum choose? Moon White / Black Leather or Quartz Grey / Beige Leather.
  2. This photo has got my reconsidering switching my order back (from moon white with black triglav's) to Quartz Grey and standard Sirius wheels.. My dealer is really going to hate me!
  3. OK so i provisionally had BW22 - but dealer contacted me today to confirm BW26! Which mean registering the car for the end of June deadline for the £1000 fuel card won't happen. I have ordered the 2.0 TSI and am also a bit confused as to what actually engine this be now? I ordered the car in the middle of March 2018
  4. I had the 2.0 petrol - it was very impressive. Very refined. But you had to rev it to drive it fast. What killed it for me was lack of an auto. Netherlands for example gets the auto. Mazda UK have decided only manual. However, I have to say the manual gearbox was amazingly good. I think if the CX-9 had come to UK it would have been very difficult choice against the Kodiaq
  5. I nearly brought a CX-5 - i had one for a w/e test drive and was really impressed. But unfortunately it was a tad too small. God knows why Mazda haven't brought the CX-9 to Europe, i'm sure it would sell really well for them.
  6. I normally liking reading all the Australian reviews. As the don't seem as biased towards diesels as they do in the UK. Regardless, I was surprised the 5008 took the win here. I don't care though, it's damm ugly IMO and with no 4wd option I still think I made the right choice. https://m.drive.com.au/new-car-reviews/peugeot-5008-v-skoda-kodiaq-v-nissan-x-trail-v-honda-cr-v-comparison-review-117749
  7. 100% agree - you can easily justify 2.0 TSI if your doing less than 12k per annum.. But 20k a year with weekly m/way runs, I would go with 2.0 TDI.
  8. Yeh i like it to, and you won't see many on the roads. i think with the chrome roof rails and window surrounds it will look good, especially if you get the black crater or triglav's.
  9. OK so i've had a look and your build is not much different to mine; 2.0 TSI 4X4 DSG Edition (7 seat) - Moon White | Black Leather 19" Sirius Alloys* Panoramic Sunroof Heated Windscreen Heated Steering Wheel LED Interior Pack Illuminated Sun Visor Folding Tables on Rear Seats Children's Pack Heated Front and Rear Seats Front and Rear Paring Sensors Rear view Camera Traffic Sign Recognition Virtual boot Pedal Rear Seat Backrest Release Waste Bin Door Panel *also ordered 19" Black Triglav Wheels (£260 incl VAT fitted ea) to replace factory wheels So looking at yours two options i wish i had added were the tow bar and canton sound system. But i had already got carried away as it was. Options you should consider are the 'rear view camera' and 'virtual boot pedal', also the rear set backrest release (it's £95)
  10. quick bit of googling - and aside from Sportline, i can only find a Karoq that would like an Edition - i actually like it, but i don't think i'm that brave to chance it
  11. Pretty much the same spec and engine i've gone for... 2.0 TSI.. hmm don't forget the £95 for the remote release of the rear seats from the boot meteor grey. I have not seen that colour before, i would check with dealer if that adds any delay in build time though?
  12. Maybe justifying it to myself - he's in the motor trade and i don't pretend to know anything about engines. I might well look into adding ACC as from memory it wasn't that expensive! I'm still wrangling with colour choice - i went for Quartz Grey with Beige leather.. But now thinking i should change it white with Black leather!!!
  13. Hi Si1978 - i am in exactly the same situation..ordered mine a couple of weeks ago and have a BW22 allocated. What colour did you go for? I too have gone for 2.0 TSI Edition model loaded with too many options to list! although i didn't go for ACC - as i don't trust computers driving the car for me. I haven't even test drove one either! I went for the 2.0 TSI because most of our runs are short one's and we do around 6,000 miles PA. Also my brother is a petrol head and kept banging on that i should go for the well proven and regarded 2.0 TSI engine that is used on many cars in the VAG group ( 2.0 petrol engine is the Audi developed EA888 Gen3B which has made use of the valve timing to further improve fuel efficiency). I hear good things about the 1.4 TSI, but I did have doubts on a turbo charged small engine in such a big car. There is no "replacement for displacement' is a phrase by brother uses. Now also with economy figures which is the real reason ppl go for the 1.4 TSI (plus of course the list price saving). There is always a huge difference between reported and the actual achievable figures in everyday driving. So if not driving it with a heavy right foot, the actual difference between the 2.0 TSI and 1.4 TSI 4WDs i don't think would not be that great. Even between the non 4WD version is only 5 mpg more.. which is £ and pence is nothing really. 1.4 2WD DSG Co2 is 143 Combined consumption 44.8 mpg 2.0 4WS DSG Co2 is 170 Combined consumption 39.8 mpg I also did ask the salesman, and while i do take it with a pinch of salt. He did comment that 2.0 TSI is the most refined engine in the range, but journo's are obessesed with diesels still. Hence why i read most of my reviews on this engine on the Australian reports. "These scores make the Kodiaq one of the more frugal cars in its class – the CX-9 officially drinks 8.8L/100km, and the Santa Fe 2.4-litre petrol, 9.4L.100km. When it does arrive the diesel will likely cost a couple of thousand dollars more and will use about 20% less fuel – meaning it’ll pay for itself only if you do fairly substantial distances with the car." http://chasingcars.com.au/review/2017-skoda-kodiaq-review-132tsi-petrol/
  14. Hi. I've read mixed reports on this option. It isn't cheap, so for nearly an extra £1000 is there a discernable difference in ride quality on cars fitted with it? I'm really interested to hear some real world opinions on this, rather than journalist's. I've ordered a 2.0 TSI 4x4 and although it's no sports car. I'm concerned that it might have to be added to my order
  15. My dealer has just given me a build week 22 for my Kodiaq 2.0 TSI edition... What are the changes for MY19 cars? Any chance of a fully digital dash like the Karoq?! I notice that is coming on the L&K model
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to BRISKODA. Please note the following important links Terms of Use. We have a comprehensive Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.