Just been doing some logging today to check mainly the MAF sesnor, which seems OK I think. Reads 171 g/s on a Shark stage 1 map. (214 ish HP roughly.)

This run was done in 2nd gear from 1500-7000 RPM

BOOST Peaks at 17 PSI, but drops down to nearly 11 at redline. Interestingly, the requested boost stays the same all the way to redline. Shouldn't it come down? Or do I have a boost leak somewhere? I thought Shark maps were closer to 19 PSI?

Thursday	16	June	2011	13:28:05	
06A 906 032 HN 		1.8L R4/5VT     G   0002			

Group A:	115			
	Engine Speed	Engine Load	Spec. Boost	Actual Boost
TIME	700-6800 RPM	15-150%	990-1800 mbar	<=1800 mbar
MARKER	STAMP	 /min	%	 mbar	 mbar
0.91	1640	79.7	1510	1060
2.22	2280	117.3	2120	1480
3.44	3240	177.4	2110	2190
4.84	4320	169.9	2080	2090
6.04	5200	160.2	2020	1930
7.26	5920	148.1	2020	1820
8.67	6520	136.8	2040	1780
9.88	6840	82.7	990	1760
11.29	4560	104.5	2080	1340
12.49	4720	124.8	990	1740
13.9	2960	21.8	990	1220
15.1	2840	12.8	990	1010

MAF:

Group B:	002			
Idle speed	Engine load	Inj. period	Air mass in
TIME	700-820 rpm	15-25%	2.0 - 4.0 ms	2.0-4.5 g/s
STAMP	 /min	%	 ms	 g/s
1.33	1800	87.2	9.86	32.61
2.62	2560	133.8	15.64	70.56
3.93	3600	164.7	19.72	111.94
5.24	4640	167.7	20.4	145.28
6.44	5440	157.9	20.06	162.03
7.77	6120	143.6	19.72	167.56
9.07	6680	135.3	16.66	171.94
10.38	5840	11.3	0	18.44
11.69	4640	166.9	20.74	150.72
12.99	4280	10.5	1.36	18.39
14.3	2920	12	1.36	12.06
15.5	2800	12.8	2.04	6.94

In 3rd Gear:

BOOST:

Thursday	16	June	2011	14:07:01	
06A 906 032 HN 		1.8L R4/5VT     G   0002			

Group A:	115			
	Engine Speed	Engine Load	Spec. Boost	Actual Boost
TIME	700-6800 RPM	15-150%	990-1800 mbar	<=1800 mbar
MARKER	STAMP	 /min	%	 mbar	 mbar
0.41	1840	60.9	1660	1100
1.71	2040	104.5	2140	1410
2.92	2280	133.8	2180	1750
4.24	2680	163.2	2200	2190
5.53	3120	167.7	2160	2220
6.84	3520	168.4	2110	2140
8.06	3880	163.2	2150	2130
9.37	4280	161.7	2130	2120
10.87	4720	160.2	2090	2080
12.17	5040	157.1	2070	2030
13.48	5360	154.9	2080	1970
14.7	5600	150.4	2090	1940
16.01	5840	148.1	2090	1910
17.32	6040	143.6	2110	1880
18.73	6200	139.8	2120	1880
20.02	6320	138.3	2120	1820
21.24	6440	136.1	2130	1850
22.44	5120	12	990	1060
23.73	3080	11.3	990	1030
25.04	1400	9	990	1010
26.36	1040	17.3	990	1000
27.67	3040	98.5	1280	1460

One thing I did think was odd was the group 020 measurements (timing retard), they measure 0 across the whole board almost

	020			
Idle Stabilization	Idle Stabilization	Idle Stabilization	Idle Stabilization
TIME				
STAMP	 CF	 CF	 CF	 CF
0.91	0	0	0	1.5
2.12	0	0	0	3
3.32	0	0	0	2.3
4.73	0	0	0	2.3
5.93	0	0	0	1.5
7.24	0	0	0	1.5
8.55	0	0	0	0.8
9.87	0	0	0	0
11.27	0	0	0	0
12.58	0	0	0	0
13.9	0	0	0	0
15.19	0	0	0	0
16.5	0	0	0	0
17.8	0	0	0	0
19.13	0	0	0	0
20.44	0	0	0	0
21.64	0	0	0	0
22.93	0	0	0	0
24.15	0	0	0	0
25.56	0	0	0	0
26.85	0	0	0	0
28.07	0	0	0	0

And the mixture seems to be OK too, riching out nicely under boost:

						
002				Group C:	031	
Idle speed					Lambda Factor	Lambda Factor
700-820 rpm				TIME		
/min				STAMP		
2080				0	0.99	1
2160				1.31	1.01	1
2040				2.53	0.96	1
2640				3.82	0.99	1
1680				5.13	0.94	1
1800				6.45	0.77	1
2040				7.74	0.97	0.95
2320				8.96	0.9	0.9
2680				10.16	0.89	0.9
3120				11.47	0.89	0.9
3520				12.78	0.89	0.88
3920				14.09	0.84	0.84
4360				15.5	0.84	0.84
4760				16.91	0.83	0.84
5080				18.22	0.8	0.81
5360				19.42	0.8	0.81
5600				20.73	0.81	0.81
5840				22.03	0.75	0.78
4920				23.35	0.75	0.74
2880				24.74	1.99	1.05

There is no way that K03s could push 1.1bar@6300 rpm

That's exactly what I was thinking. :wonder:

Surely the requested boost should go down as the revs rise? Any more, and I would be getting underboost faults.