Must say that I am amazed with the recent technology with 3D.

I have an LG 55" LED TV 3D with an LG 3D Home Cinema kit and Sky HD.

Just watched Sanctum on 3D and the effect is utterly amazing ! There's absolutely NO ghosting or blurs, just crystal clear 3D.

It's passive 3D technology and I feel that this will be the way forward, especially as it uses normal 3D glasses and after over 2 hours of use, there's no eye fatigue whatsoever.

Very impressed and very recommended

Not a cheap bit of kit thou! When the prices come down I'm sure most households will have a 3d box of some sort or another.

LG - pah. its all about Panasonic

Got the 3D Blu Ray surround sound system which works on the xbox too

All depends on whether you can see 3D.

Out of curiosity which model LG is it?

LG - pah. its all about Panasonic

Got the 3D Blu Ray surround sound system which works on the xbox too

I tried the Panasonic but to be honest the active 3D wasn't as comfortable to wear, plus the Wife was choosing too .......

All depends on whether you can see 3D.

Out of curiosity which model LG is it?

It's the LG 55 LW650t

Think LG have upped there game, much like Samsung etc.

Got a Sony myself and very pleased with it.

3D a bit of a gimmick but entertaining non the less.

Do think many a broadcast program in HD have a depth almost 3D like with detail to match.

Got to have a dedicated surround system though as the onboard speakers are dreadful!

Panasonic always do well in the magazine tests but think they really need to address there aesthetic as to me they are stuck in the 90's when it comes to design.

Think LG have upped there game, much like Samsung etc.

Got a Sony myself and very pleased with it.

3D a bit of a gimmick but entertaining non the less.

Do think many a broadcast program in HD have a depth almost 3D like with detail to match.

Got to have a dedicated surround system though as the onboard speakers are dreadful!

Panasonic always do well in the magazine tests but think they really need to address there aesthetic as to me they are stuck in the 90's when it comes to design.

Absolutely agreed.

I watched another 3D Blu Ray documentary tonight called 'Tahiti Wave' and boy, some of the 3D scenes in there are outstanding !

The LG does a great job as well with the 2D to 3D conversion. Watching the TV from any angle doesn't matter one iota either. The features and picture quality are top drawer.

I know the Panasonics always get great reviews (I've had Panasonic in the past) and as mentioned before, the real clincher for us was the 7 pairs of 3D passive glasses with the LG that weigh nothing. Don't get me wrong though, I spent £1500 and could have pushed the boat out further for the Panasonic (TX-P55VT30B for example) but the passive 3D suits us completely.

3D does not work for me due to having poor eyesight in one eye. One thing to remember about 3D is that its not High definition, yes it requires a full HD TV, and bluray but this is just a carrier for the media. Half the vertical and horizontal resolution is used to generate the 3D effect, so its actually more or less the same resolution that UK Pal.

The way to go is to Buy a 3d Projector like any of the optoma range and the optoma 3D box. The cheapest is about £600 and will blow away any plasma or lcd screen. Mine runs at 100" and is more involving than any small plasma screen. Ive tried 50" plus and the visual field is poor even in the smallest room . Just my opinion and 25 years in tv and radio.

I'm still looking for a decent large screen that doesn't have 3D - I wear glasses so another pair on top is a pain, and it's not actually 3D anyway, more a of a child's pop-up book look, with flat 2D planes given artificial depth. And that's just passive 3D! Active 3D makes everythough around me flicker, which is common among roughly 1/5 of the British public from what I gather.

Roll on hologramatic 3D

The way to go is to Buy a 3d Projector like any of the optoma range and the optoma 3D box. The cheapest is about £600 and will blow away any plasma or lcd screen. Mine runs at 100" and is more involving than any small plasma screen. Ive tried 50" plus and the visual field is poor even in the smallest room . Just my opinion and 25 years in tv and radio.

Oh wow, 25 years in radio.. must give you an amazing outlook in visual displays

3D does not work for me due to having poor eyesight in one eye. One thing to remember about 3D is that its not High definition, yes it requires a full HD TV, and bluray but this is just a carrier for the media. Half the vertical and horizontal resolution is used to generate the 3D effect, so its actually more or less the same resolution that UK Pal.

This is not true in all cases, one of the advantages of active shutter technology is that it's possible to have full HD in 3D to each eye (1920x1080) whereas passive 3D TVs currently only offer half the vertical resolution to each eye although apparently it should be possible to also offer full HD to each eye as well.

I have one of the Samsung d6xxx TVs which has the 'broken' 3D in that despite using active shutter technology it halves the vertical resolution (1920x540 to each eye) but I knew this before I bought it and I'm not fussed as I didn't buy it for 3D. The first 3D films I watched (all at the same cinema) gave me splitting headaches so I assumed 3D wasn't for me although recently I've been fine so I wonder if the cinema didn't have their system set up correctly as there's been times when the projector has been noticeably out of focus for 2D films. That aside I'm still not fussed about 3D, I prefer not having to wear glasses and I find the picture sharper in 2D without the 3D effect.

John