http://www.projxracing.com/

why do i get the hunch i "need" one of these...

Still looks underwheeled... still, nice to see more brit GT entries.

Looks nice, shame its cheaply built with an expensive price tag.

made giggle to spot the ford focus light switch in the car, sales assistant asked what i was laughing at so i told her and she got embarresed and started to talk about how powerfull it was.

is it just me or in the flesh do they look a bit like a tonka toy?

A no. of faults i noticed:

1. big gap between door card and door glass, a few weeks later the dealer inserted a strip to bridge the gap, still looks cheap.

2. Big gaps in the door panels, you can see the sticker on the inside of the door

3. rover 25 door handles

4. rover 25 door mirrors

5.The wiper stalks look like there from a maestro.

6.The wheels dont look that nice for a car of

Looks like it could do with a wing on the back and a bigger set of wheels, although I take it this pic doesn;t show it in full race-spec?

Still say, as unusual looking as it was, that the Qvale looked better before MG got hold of it...

(which hurts, as before the SV, I regarded Peter Stevens as the best... notably for his XJR15)

Looks nice, shame its cheaply built with an expensive price tag.

Last time I went to Horners the Rover stealer had one of those outside. I had a look inside and thought ugh that is tacky!!!!

The black one? Thats the one I was looking at with the faults.

p.s. the glovebox doesnt close properly.

I think its a real shame as I really wanted the car to do well.

ian, is that what the sv is based on? if so then its muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuch nicer

Yup... in fact Qvale still sell that car in US markets, think they ship a rolling chassis to MG.