No no...we always follow the legislation...even if it's wrong.

The guy was going almost 3 times above the speed limit...but that's ok, the law says it's fine....

RIGHT!!! This topic seems to be going on and ON!!!

Lets make one thing clear.....The Police (as a whole) thought that he was taking the micky so the POLICE prosecuted him!!!!!

The POLICE think he should be punished.......

If the court decides to agree with his made up excuse that thats up to them !!!!!!!!

Wrong, wrong and thrice wrong!

The police decide to report the offence.

The CPS decide to prosecute.

The Judiciary decides guilt.

is this thread still going? Wow... whats the verdict then?

Guilty! *ker-bang!*

Just gonna chuck in my twopenworth

Im actually AMAZED this guy got to court, the authorities are constantly brainwashing us that speed kills, he was doing 160mph, and hes not dead ?? are we being fed a load of bullsh!t by the authorities, and speed doesnt really kill ?? (shock horror and other looks of amazement)

80 in a 30 who sets the speed limits for these roads ? councils under advice from police??, now, they deem those roads are not safe over 30mph, and yet this guy PROVED they are,.. again..whos bullsh!tting who ??

Im just waiting for our police farce to start shooting innocent people (yeh I know they do already but bear with me) after all, the armed officers can claim they was doing familiarisation

There really is a "them and us" culture in this country, and it has been perpatrated by them, dont do as I do, do as I say

the important thing is he did not get done.

give hope for us all...

Wrong' date=' wrong and thrice wrong!

The police decide to report the offence.

The CPS decide to prosecute.

The Judiciary decides guilt.[/quote']

Well no, I'm not wrong (my law degree and current job tell me that......)

Yes point taken, the Police 'report' for the offence (or decide that he should be prosecuted....) the CPS prosecuted at court (traffic offences arn't reviewed by the CPS until they are handed out at court, and you dont need an MG3 charging advice from the CPS in order to bring a charge/ or report in this case, so in reality the whole decision to prosecute lay with the Police, but yes at court the case was put by the cps....... ) HOWEVER

My point (albeit slighly deflected by the argument about whether I'm wrong- which i'm not is....)

Even the Police thought that this bloke was in the wrong - It was the judge that said his driving did not constitute an offence.

(for futher reading on the above arguement about whether or not I'm 'thrice wrong' see any good law book, regarding the separation of Powers (except of course the lord chancellor) and have a look at the latest charging standards from the CPS with reference to operation emerald......... )

Well no' date=' I'm not wrong (my law degree and current job tell me that......)

Yes point taken, the Police 'report' for the offence (or decide that he should be prosecuted....) the CPS prosecuted at court (traffic offences arn't reviewed by the CPS until they are handed out at court, and you dont need an MG3 charging advice from the CPS in order to bring a charge/ or report in this case, so in reality the whole decision to prosecute lay with the Police, but yes at court the case was put by the cps....... ) HOWEVER

My point (albeit slighly deflected by the argument about whether I'm wrong- which i'm not is....)

[b']Even the Police thought that this bloke was in the wrong - It was the judge that said his driving did not constitute an offence.[/b]

(for futher reading on the above arguement about whether or not I'm 'thrice wrong' see any good law book, regarding the separation of Powers (except of course the lord chancellor) and have a look at the latest charging standards from the CPS with reference to operation emerald......... )

[little britain]

Yeah well yeah you know err mm yeah well

[/little britain]

Still going on and on and on and on...

11 pages - crazy

11 pages - crazy

and 2 more replies from you that add absolutely nothing to the discussion.

I think as many points of view have been aired as physically possible...

Gone off track me thinks. No worries though, as long as the users keep friendly... :P

I think as many points of view have been aired as physically possible...

Gone off track me thinks. No worries though' date=' as long as the users keep friendly... :P[/quote']

Do you consider a to be friendly?

Do you consider a to be friendly?

alright, alright... we've all had a coffee. Chill.

I retract my blatant misuse of animation. :eek:

Apologies to those who were offended.

im not offended.

thread is load of leftie ******.

personally any speed which you dont get caught for on a motorway is fine.

past a school @ kicking out time is a diff story.

past a school @ kicking out time is a diff story.

You only think that because you'll miss the "totty" if you go too fast :haha:

You only think that because you'll miss the "totty" if you go too fast :haha:

abso fooking looootly.

Year 9 or 10 guys? pervs...

Year 9 or 10 guys[/b']? pervs...

Think he's probably more interested in the girls :P:rofl:

Chris