Yeti Engine Codes

[The Plumber]

Engine codes for Yeti during Production Years 2009 to 2012 are:

Diesel

First Generation Common Rail (CR)

CBDB = 2.0TDI (140) 4x4, from production start WK22/09, withdrawn week 45/09

Injection control - Bosch EDC 17 CP 14

CEGA = 2.0TDI (170) 4x4, introduced to range WK45/09, withdrawn week 22/10

Injection control - Bosch EDC 17 CP 14_2.4

Second Generation Common Rail (CR)

CAYC = 1.6TDI (105) Greenline II introduced to range WK45/10

Injection control - Bosch EDC 17 CP 14

CFHA = 2.0TDI (110), introduced to range WK45/09

Injection control - Bosch EDC 17 C 46

CLCA = 2.0TDI (110), EU4 emissions standard no DPF, to be introduced to range November 2011 (Indian market)

Injection control - Bosch EDC 17 C 46

CFHF = 2.0TDI (110) 4x4, introduced to range WK45/09

Injection control - Bosch EDC 17 C 46

CFHC = 2.0TDI (140) 4x4, replaced CBDB engine from week 45/09

Injection control - Bosch EDC 17 C 46

CLCB = 2.0TDI (140) 4x4, EU4 emissions standard no DPF, introduced May 2010 (Indian market)

Injection control - Bosch EDC 17 C 46

CFJA = 170 TDI 4x4, replaced CEGA engine from week 22/10

Injection control - Bosch EDC 17 C 46

Petrol

CBZB = 1.2TSI (105), introduced to range WK41/09

Ignition control - Simos 10

CAXA = 1.4TSI (122), introduced to range July 2010

Injection control - Bosch Motronic MED 17.5.20

CDAA = 1.8TSI (160) 4x4, from production start WK22/09

Ignition control - Bosch Motronic MED 17.5

CDAB = 1.8TSI (152) 4x4, introduced to range WK45/09 (UK from May 2011; SE Plus only)

Ignition control - Bosch Motronic MED 17.5

Majority of this info kindly provided by JonA

The following is a list of all TDI Common Rail engines used by the Yeti, Superb and Octavia (May 2011)

CAYC 1.6 105 - Octavia, Superb & Yeti

CBBB 2.0 170 - Superb to WK22/10

CBDB 2.0 140 - Yeti to WK45/09

CEGA 2.0 170 - Octavia & Yeti (Yeti to WK22/10)

CFFB 2.0 140 - Superb

CFGB 2.0 170 - Superb from WK22/10

CFHA 2.0 110 (250 N/m) - Yeti

CFHC 2.0 140 - Octavia & Yeti (Yeti from WK45/09)

CFHF 2.0 110 (280 N/m) - Octavia & Yeti

CFJA 2.0 170 - Yeti from WK22/10

CLCA 2.0 110 - Octavia & Yeti (India) (Yeti from September 2011)

CLCB 2.0 140 - Octavia & Yeti (India)

CLJA 2.0 140 - Superb (India)

TP

[bi1b0]

This excerpt from VW's ELSA might be quite interesting as well. Shows very well the difference in the engine control systems and the production periods. I updated the information in Wikipedia as well, hopefully without errors (got tired after updating the Bulgarian article before that :zzz:).

BTW, rather strange that CDAB is presented as only EU4 compliant. Must be a typo, I suppose. Also, other sources suggest the 1.2 TSI is 8v SOHC, yet here the number of valves per cylinder is 4, so it must be 16v DOHC after all, unless that's a typo too. Nevertheless fixed that in Wikipedia as well; now waiting for the angry reactions.

[larryblag]

Problem

Ordered a 2012 2.0 S with engine code CFHA. Brochure and dealer have confirmed 280Nm torque (I need this as I tow a caravan) but your list states CFHA is only 250Nm (same as 1.6 greenline II) the CFHF (4x4 models) being actually 280Nm . could the brochure and dealer both be wrong? If this is the case I'll not be a happy man as I specifically requested this information and would otherwise have gone for the Greenline II instead.

Edited 16 May, 2013 by larryblag

[Brijo]

If this helps, here's Annie's plate:

First line is max gross car weight, second is max train weight (car+van). I've no idea about engine code but, as you can see from signature, 2.0 ltr CR 140 4x4 DSG. Tows 1300Kg+ like a dream.

[Llanigraham]

Problem

Ordered a 2012 2.0 S with engine code CFHA. Brochure and dealer have confirmed 280Nm torque (I need this as I tow a caravan) but your list states CFHA is only 250Nm (same as 1.6 greenline II) the CFHF (4x4 models) being actually 280Nm . could the brochure and dealer both be wrong? If this is the case I'll not be a happy man as I specifically requested this information and would otherwise have gone for the Greenline II instead.

It might help us if you put your location in your details.

Certainly the 140 bhp 4x4 copes more than adequately with my caravan.

[larryblag]

Yes, sorry guys. Nottingham UK. Thanks for all your help so far. We couldn't quite stretch to the 4x4 ones so it's 1.6 105 ps 250Nm or the 2.0 110 ps 280 Nm (according to dealer and brochure).

If they are wrong, I might as well go for the Greenline as it's £30 road tax and does a potential 64mpg (not towing obviously ).

Caravan is 800kg (1000kg mgw) but we might be swapping for a four birth soon so we need a bit extra Oomph -hence my need to choose wisely :think:

P. S.

I've also contacted Skoda UK so I'll post their reply on here.

[Brijo]

Yes, sorry guys. Nottingham UK. ...

You might care to add that to your profile, for our future info.

The car/'van match service offered by http://www.towsafe.co.uk is worth the modest cost IMHO.

[Llanigraham]

Personally I'd ignore the "nm" figures and just concentrate on the "ps" (or BHP as we oldies prefer).

110 should easily cope with a 'van of 1000kg, but anything over 1200kg I'd be wanting the more powerful 140 bhp. That more than adequately copes with that weight.

[The Plumber]

Problem

Ordered a 2012 2.0 S with engine code CFHA. Brochure and dealer have confirmed 280Nm torque (I need this as I tow a caravan) but your list states CFHA is only 250Nm (same as 1.6 greenline II) the CFHF (4x4 models) being actually 280Nm . could the brochure and dealer both be wrong? If this is the case I'll not be a happy man as I specifically requested this information and would otherwise have gone for the Greenline II instead.

This may have come from their Elsawin; I've an 2011 fleebay copy and it quotes 280Nm for the CFHA but I'm convinced that's incorrect as the CFHF can be installed in other models with 2wd, so there would be no point having two engines producing the same figures.

Checked Skoda Auto's own on-line information and it states 2wd 250Nm and 4x4 280Nm for the 110 (81kw) engine.

Would still go with the 2.0 TDI mind, personally I think it's a better motor than the 1.6 and also worth bearing in mind it's effectively a detuned 140.

TP

[larryblag]

Cheers guys (and a special thank you to "The Plumber")

I was always told that torque = "pulling power" so this is more important than shear bhp for towing. I'll wait until the car arrives as I intend to inspect it before they fit towbar. Then I'll only really kick off if there are other issues. Distance selling rules probably apply anyway as it's a used vehicle and I've not had previous opportunity to exam it. :wonder:

[rockhopper]

This may have come from their Elsawin; I've an 2011 fleebay copy and it quotes 280Nm for the CFHA but I'm convinced that's incorrect as the CFHF can be installed in other models with 2wd, so there would be no point having two engines producing the same figures.

Checked Skoda Auto's own on-line information and it states 2wd 250Nm and 4x4 280Nm for the 110 (81kw) engine.

Would still go with the 2.0 TDI mind, personally I think it's a better motor than the 1.6 and also worth bearing in mind it's effectively a detuned 140.

TP

And because it is only a detuned CR140, it can be remapped to about 170bhp and around 350-400 nm depending on who you go with. It will also improve your economy providing you don't use all the extra power.

Note of caution though. The CR110 has smaller front brakes and is not quite as easily upgradable as the CR140, which is easy to fit CR170 front brakes to.

A TapaTalk enabled phone was used to write this...

[larryblag]

UPDATE:

S.U.K Have today confirmed (verbally) that the CFHA engine does produce 280Nm max torque.