wyx087

There's different levels of the electricity energy chain, from generation to distribution and supplying end user. It's not as simple as making the whole lot public owned will solve all problems. I personally think supplying side should stay private. There is already a huge amount of regulation to ensure no price gauging, such as price cap. There is still a lot of room for innovation here, for example the Kraken platform by Octopus Energy and more varied time-of-use tariff. Distribution should definitely be public owned, this is part of key infrastructure of this country. Generation... depends, nuclear plants should be public owned to ensure there is a base level of generation. Renewables should be privately owned to drive investment, parts sourcing competitiveness, building speed and innovation. Fossil fuel plants can be private but must also have storage facilities to use that grid connection to enable more renewables. As time goes on, it would be more and more financially beneficial to invest in battery storage than burn gas. Finally, as mentioned, there is a strong need to decouple wholesale price from gas price. Current system makes wholesale price equal to most expensive source, which is gas plants. Pricing should be proportional, as starter for 10, 30% gas when wind is blowing should mean gas price only pull up wholesale price by no more than 30%.

No truer word had been said. When one seeks out problems, especially on platforms with algorithm to keep feeding you the same, one find problems. But in actual fact there is very little problem in the real world for vast majority of people.

Get Electroverse RFID card and authorisation takes seconds. Get a Tesla and use superchargers, starts charging within 2 seconds. Usually no queues either, or the car re-routes to other less busy charger automatically during a long drive. It is my real world experience from 2023 onwards that EV's really don't need to take minutes to plug in or doing payment authorisation. Come on, get real and stop spreading second-hand charging experiences from people who've never driven EV or trying to paint a different light. Find someone who have never visited petrol station and see how long they need to refuel. I remember fuelling up at Tesco and hearing cashier come on loud speaker telling someone to "press the yellow button" (or similar). Just because you are familiar with fuelling up but unfamiliar with charging doesn't mean it will always be like this.

Because even when services built together with petrol station, you still have to spend 5+ minutes move the car to the petrol station and fuel up manually. You don't have to wait around for those 10-30 minutes rapid charging, just plug in. This is why number of plugs at service car park is more important than each rapid charger delivering maximum possible speed all the time. Last weekend, I was chatting to a family friend (wife's friend's husband) who drives all over Europe as sales manager in a Model 3 LR, away most weekdays. He picked up the car same time as my MY. At 2 years old he got 255 Wh/mi (or 3.9 mi/kWh) mostly on European motorway. It's at over 50k on the odometer now. He's very happy with the car and EV overall, wouldn't have anything else. I'm sure as someone doing so much miles for work, time is important for him....... My neighbour regularly drives to France to meet with supplier in a GV60, again, driving for work, I wonder if saving time is important for him and how can he make EV work for him.......

Today is the last day UK electricity grid will burn coal. https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/the-uks-journey-to-a-coal-power-phase-out/ https://www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/coal-death-uk There is vast difference in UK grid between 10 years ago when my Nissan Leaf rolled off production line and today. The carbon emission for EV gets less and less as whole grid becomes greener. Considering a vehicle typically lives over 10 years, best get more of these vehicles that automatically reduces emissions on the road now.

US salt water flooding are warning about EV's fire risk, probably due to failed battery seal: https://www.speakev.com/threads/is-this-another-ev-myth.187382/post-3668211 source: https://cleantechnica.com/2024/09/29/flood-fire-risk-with-evs-at-least-some-ev-packs-need-better-water-sealing/ We've seen this failure mode before with the Scotland flood warranty case, salt water is going to be far worse.

5:30 bit saying only 5 cars can charge at full speed and if 19 cars come, can't charge at full speed. The reality is that battery charge rate slows down as they charge. No EV in existence can sustain full charging speed beyond 50%. So it is smarter to offer more plugs than capacity and share the capacity allowing more people to start charging and reduce the queue. This is why I like Kermpower rapid chargers because the screen will clearly state what is the limiting factor. In lieu of grid capacity, it is always possible to add battery buffers. Tesla was doing this back in 2017: https://electrek.co/2017/10/30/tesla-supercharger-stays-online-in-power-outage-powerpack-system/ There is some truth in the CEO's job role change: The reason is that they are planning to expand the company globally: https://www.current-news.co.uk/gridserve-global-expansion-plan/ https://evfleetworld.co.uk/gridserve-plans-global-expansion-to-drive-world-class-ev-charging-networks/ https://evmagazine.com/charging-and-infrastructure/gridserve-expands-globally-with-sustainable-ev-charging https://transportandenergy.com/2024/08/13/gridserve-announces-global-expansion-plans/ https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/gridserve-announces-global-expansion-plans Unless we can find numerous people were previously Gridserve employee, it's hard to verify people being made redundant statements. At 3:38 me thinks the truth comes out. This "anonymous" letter Geoff was "reading"...... Some people can't help but insert personal opinion disguised as factual statements.

(there's a thread for new hubs in England)

Those are great, scan the QR code and see charging stats. They also do power share and says on the screen what is the limiting factor. I think they are the best, most educational rapid charger available. 288 kW on Chademo No car can take advantage of that.

👍👍👍👍👍 😘 Although I must point out my previous comments for using public transport or micro-mobility were egged on by posters such as yourself, asking for validation on my idea about changing the way everyone moves around. I have never talked about "how green" I am in virtual signalling way, this must be your imagination. Also, the point regarding following other's footstep. I have said it many times, it's about making EV the first option to consider, and then choose ICE if EV doesn't suit. I don't think anyone here is pretending EV can work for 100% of population right now.

When I had Tesla came to change rear lights due to condensation in early 2023, they were driving old (pre facelift) modified Model S with tool rack where rear seat would be. Just like Cleevely EV's modified MG5. Depending on their availability, I might get them to fit new shock absorbers on my Leaf. It's failing..... 😞

I'd thought 21c for testing is a common temperature. Car: 20-22c, depending on outside weather. If it's hot, 22c because I'm wearing less to start with. If I'm wearing stuff for 10~15c like today, then 20c. I also don't like wearing jacket for long drives in winter, then I'll probable bump to 21c. Wife's zone: 22c all year round + heated seat. May even get bumped to 23c. Her Leaf is short distances, she uses heated everything and 20c in winter. At home, it's generally 20c with smart thermostat downstairs in the living room. Upstairs can get to 23c on a sunny winter day, wife likes to stays up there and I prefer down here. New thread direction, why do woman like it hot? 🤣 Also, not all cars are tuned equal:

Good repair, another one back on the road. As Leaf depreciate, £1000 will increasingly look like "beyond economical" repair. Leafspy is really a wonderful piece of software. Recently my wife's Leaf started having knocking sound to the front left. Got ATS to do free suspension check and they diagnosed with failed shock absorber. Lower control arm had been recently replaced (3 years ago for right and 1 year ago for left). So looks like it'll be a £600 job for both sides. I'll be doing rounds to get quotes from local garages later today.

Here is a direct link to EU commission official website again, stating what they plan to do: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/ en/ip_22_6462 "The European Commission welcomes the agreement reached last night by the European Parliament and Council ensuring all new cars and vans registered in Europe will be zero-emission by 2035. " It's best for everyone if you stop listening to those fanning the flame of hate. At very least try to find correct information for yourself before typing away to have your last say.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/eu-countries-poised-approve-2035-phaseout-co2-emitting-cars-2023-03-28/ "The EU law will require all new cars sold to have zero CO2 emissions from 2035, and 55% lower CO2 emissions from 2030, versus 2021 levels. " https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/ en/ip_22_6462 "The European Commission welcomes the agreement reached last night by the European Parliament and Council ensuring all new cars and vans registered in Europe will be zero-emission by 2035." You sure PHEV will be allowed? Cheeky change of definition. But last time I checked, PHEV count as "some form of electric" yet it is still not zero-emission as per EU 2035 target.

From your parliament.uk link: "This will rise from 22% in 2024 to 80% by 2030 and 100% in 2035. " Currently not much different to EU. The original 2030 phase-out plan by Conservative government have a TBD requirement for electric-only miles. Vehicle can still be 100% powered from ICE bought at petrol station up to 2035. https://www.evexperts.co.uk/what-are-labours-plans-for-electric-cars/ "Restore the new petrol/diesel car phase-out date to 2030;" This doesn't sound like Labour plan to change this.

Again, it isn't either or. Not twisting, this post yet again shows you view total ownership cost ("promise of cheaper motoring") must be calculated with either slow or fast cost. It simply isn't the case. Just because rapid charging is expensive, doesn't mean it would dominate overall charging cost, also known as cost per mile. Expensive charging would be a small percentage of total charging cost. When convenient, charge slowly, when needed, pay more for the speed. It's a mix. For example, for me, 93.6% of my charging is at 7 to 7.5 p/kWh. Rest is around 30-45 p/kWh. Overall is going to be less than 10 p/kWh. Less than 3p/mile. Yes, I visit regularly, last time was Dec 2023. Yes, I had previously lived there for over 12 years. Again, I'm not saying those youtube channels are wrong. As you keep saying, there's truth in them. I'm just pointing out that the image they project often have an agenda against the said secretive government and it is not the full picture. TBH this is true of any divisive topic and social media algorithms feed this extremist cycle the more you watch. Again, not blaming you for posting, but similar channels saying the same thing does not make the said problem wide spread. Actual scale of problems/unrest are difficult to judge through social media. As you say, "truth is hard" to come by. I'm only highlighting that particular channel because years ago I've watched a dozen of his videos on other issues but later discovered discrepancy to what's happening on the ground. Around here, I found truth is usually half way between social media extreme reporting and traditional media's muted reporting. Key is finding the balance and not solely relying one.

The charging speed is not either or. This is often not understood by people without EV ownership experience, after all, petrol pumps dispense at 1 speed. Slow charging is cheaper, that will incentivises people to use slow charging when speed isn't needed (eg. overnight, workplace). Win-win for both grid carbon emission and individual's pocket. When charging speed is needed, for example whilst on the road, then just pay higher cost to get the speed. For vast majority of people, needing to charge quickly whilst on the road will be a tiny percent of their overall miles. For me, it has been less than 7% across 2 vehicles. But I admit I do more day trips than long road trips away..... accommodation are expensive. That video is from a long time youtuber that has an agenda, he has never said a good thing about the CCP government. Just like people brand Robert Llewellyn based on his always positive EV outlook and not showing the full picture. I wouldn't expect anything else from that particular youtube channel. So be careful about that channel and count on them not showing the full picture to fit their narrative. Note, I'm not rubbishing your own post. I'm only pointing out limitation of that particular youtube channel from my previous experiences on multiple different issues. And when you go down this youtube algo rabbit hole, many more will appear. The situation on the ground is vastly different to what's been reported by those channels.

Real cost of driving EV long distance, during May bank holiday: Absolutely no problem with the VW 60 kWh battery. Only need to regularly charging to 100% is recommended is LFP batteries. If your mileage is very low, can even consider lowering charge limit, I regularly charge to 60% and only up it when I need the extra miles. But I'm not keen on relying on granny charger. It is highly dependent on the plug socket. An old socket with weak pins may overheat which is a hazard if you are charging overnight. Either charge during the day and check on it (touch the plug casing) every hour or get a proper charge point fitted. Regarding public charging. Just get Electroverse card: https://electroverse.octopus.energy/map (message me for a referral link and get a few £ credit on sign up, same with switching to Octopus Energy) Single Electroverse card covers vast majority of UK networks. See here:

The price of a well spec'd Enyaq was not much different from EV6/Model Y back then. There was indeed waaaay too many options and must tick most of them to have good spec. Short tests have shown it doesn't actually matter that much. But I still think heat pump is worth having if you are worried about range over longer trips in winter. It will draw less power to maintain cabin temperature vs PTC heater. Keep in mind implementation varies HUGELY, I think Enyaq heating system is more like i3, no car from traditional manufacturers do heat scavenging like Tesla's back then. If mostly shorter local journey, don't need to look for heat pump car.

Climate change as result of man made green house gas emissions is real. There is strong scientific consensus and any doubts are cast by individuals with ulterior motive. UN statement on climate change: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/what-is-climate-change UK MET office observations: https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/climate-change/what-is-climate-change Well researched and referenced book on FUD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchants_of_Doubt Every year, we get more extreme weather events. Every year the poorest in society suffer. We on this car owners forum are already the privileged ones. On a personal level, I'm debating whether to spend the outlay and install air-to-air heat pump, also known as air conditioning units, namely multi-split across 3-4 rooms. It can both reduce gas usage in winter and make whole houses comfortable in the few days of extreme heat. All powered using rooftop solar or cheap off-peak electricity. As you keep saying, "I'm alright Jack". But many people do suffer from the heat, even in cold rainy UK. This is data from 2023: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/heat-mortality-monitoring-reports/heat-mortality-monitoring-report-2023

Such as public charging not as convenient as petrol stations? Ignoring the climate crisis and how EV is a stepping stone towards saving humanity?

In your opinion, does pushing forward EV adoption NOT count as looking after as many people as possible?

Indeed. Micro mobility includes bikes, manual scooters as well as currently illegal e-scooter. Normally we walk to local Coop corner shop. There's also a retail park within walking distance and to my wife's delight they recently opened a large-ish M&S Food in there. Big Tesco in easy micro-mobility distance or slightly long walking distance. I only drive to big Tesco once a week to do big click&collect, all other smaller purchases are done locally by walking. GP and dentist are similar, in long walk distance. Swimming pool and cinema is in micro-mobility distance. I don't go to bank branches anymore but there's 2 high streets in micro-mobility distance. This is what I like about living here. Having most things within reach, almost like 15min city concept And solves my biggest bug bear living here: congestion. Whenever North Circular is congested, the roads nearby become a rat-run and it takes 20 minutes minimum to drive anywhere.

Hum, I'm very confused here. There's another case of say one thing doing another: You say you don't "knowing spread FUD". You also say you are not disputing that EV are comprehensively proven to be produce less carbon emissions But earlier you said: Sure, you used the uncertainty word. But if it is comprehensively proven facts (which you directly quoted and said don't dispute), then why does it not comprehensively stop you from repeating those proven false FUD? Cobalt is used in many things, some electric motor has a tiny fraction of cobalt. Just as the starter motor for ICE may also have cobalt. They are also used in alloys, as catalyst and as gamma emitters. Just having cobalt does not make them bad. Last time I checked, no car is being recycled at anyone's local recycling centre. They are not designed to take extremely large items such as a passenger vehicle. Your point is entirely absurd. Li-on battery recycling is coming when volume gets there, current volume is not enough to sustain a large industry in every corner of the world. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1682-5 UK company: https://www.veolia.co.uk/battery-recycling Another company: https://www.fortum.com/services/battery-recycling/lithium-ion-battery-recycling-technology So posting links relevant to discussion, and adding a comment on how it affects battery requirement is not allowed? Must require actual driving experience? Another extremely absurd statement from you. This isn't about questioning things. This is about spread the truth and not spread misinformation. Truth is that ICE are not banned after 2030. You can still buy new vehicles with ICE and exclusively use petrol stations. Speaking of questioning things. funny how when I question your points, pointing out the obvious, it is not respecting opinions or you view as picking on you for "don't see things in the same light".