for me its very same old but i bought it for the multiplayer and until the hackers spoil it its very good

Aye there are some players with some very "questionable" ability online. And a lot of this is down again to their continued re usage of an engine that is fundamentally six years old.

Most people seem to complete it in around 4-5 hours on hard. Considering I have put about 15 hours into Skyrim so far and have barely started its a complete rip off if you dont play multiplayer but then I guess most of these generic shooters are the same.

Well I tried multiplayer this morning.. Very very dissapointed!

No ranked dedicated servers.. Incredible! If you want to rank you have to use that awful match making system!! I can't believe IW have cocked it up again, Black Ops was so much better.

Some smaller game shops were selling this over a week early so some people have had an extra week to get better guns and perks!! I find hardcore better as its more fair. Otherwise i find the more experienced gamers get all the action and kill me more. Servers are still a big problem, maybe they should have spent longer sorting that than adding extra details that arent necessary. I do prefer infinity ward over treyarch though.

As everyone else has said, Homeplugs, cheap switch upstairs.

Sorted.

Any1 prestiged yet? im on level 74 atm

It aint no BF3 thats fo'sho

I'm afraid that the critics actually are saying it wipes the floor with battle field 3! They like it!

Not in any of the reviews I've read. For a non "ZOMG MUDURN WERFAIR FWEEE!!!!!111111twelve" review, see here: http://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/pc/2011/11/10/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-3-review/1

Don't forget James is on a PS3, which choke the crap out of battlefield due to hardware limitations, I think it's 32 players tops for a start

I bet theres not much in the COD titles between the two formats