Just now, logiclee said:

No Balancer shafts.

That's a backward step IMHO - probably in the quest to improve emissions figures.

8 hours ago, SWBoy said:

That's a backward step IMHO - probably in the quest to improve emissions figures.

Not sure why you would think it is a backward step since most owners and users seem very happy with existing smoothness, economy/performance of the engine.

Why add complication and weight where it is not required?

 

9 hours ago, Gerrycan said:

Not sure why you would think it is a backward step since most owners and users seem very happy with existing smoothness, economy/performance of the engine.

Why add complication and weight where it is not required?

Having owned several 3-cylinder engined cars with balancer shafts (VAG and non-VAG) and test driven some without I find those without to have noticeably worse engine rpm related vibration which for me makes them seem rough - so IMHO the balancer shafts are essential.

 

Other opinions are available and respected.

On 25/05/2018 at 17:04, logiclee said:

"Due to its high-end material specification, this toothed timing belt’s service life reliably spans the entire life of the vehicle. As a result, it is no longer necessary to perform the previously obligatory replacement of the toothed belt as a maintenance item."

That's an interesting claim, given all the discussion here about replacement intervals.