2.0 cr ....eco is on by default ...but not adverse to brisk driving on occasion!

19 hours ago, BriBri said:

2.0 cr ....eco is on by default ...but not adverse to brisk driving on occasion!

 

 

19 hours ago, BriBri said:

2.0 cr ....eco is on by default ...but not adverse to brisk driving on occasion!

 

Adverse to dusting though 

4 hours ago, BNT1985 said:

 

 

Adverse to dusting though 

Wondered how long before someone called me out on that !

12 hours ago, BriBri said:

Wondered how long before someone called me out on that !

Better? 

 

13 hours ago, BriBri said:

Wondered how long before someone called me out on that !

We do get a lot of sand from the Sahara deposited in the Midlands so perhaps the sunroof was open!

17 hours ago, BNT1985 said:

 

 

Adverse to dusting though 

My 26 mile commute takes me between 35 to 48 minutes depending on whether the quarry train is leaving or entering the quarry. Thank God for stop/start as it's the slowest moving train in the UK!

1 hour ago, shyVRS245 said:

My 26 mile commute takes me between 35 to 48 minutes depending on whether the quarry train is leaving or entering the quarry. Thank God for stop/start as it's the slowest moving train in the UK!

That would drive me up the wall! Oh and my 37 mile commute takes 45 mins. Does that mean I "win"? 

7 minutes ago, BriBri said:

That would drive me up the wall! Oh and my 37 mile commute takes 45 mins. Does that mean I "win"? 

I once did the first 17 miles from work in 15 minutes at an average of 68MPH but I was too busy having fun to take a picture!

On 06/08/2018 at 22:48, shyVRS245 said:

That's because it hasn't got any power to give (115bhp)!

On 08/08/2018 at 01:30, BriBri said:

Wondered how long before someone called me out on that !

 

I usually get called out on the dust on my screen by friends, I couldn't resist when you put that picture up 

Edited 9 August, 20187 yr by BNT1985

On 08/08/2018 at 14:47, BriBri said:

Better? 

 

Two things come straightforward to me from your pictures: dusting seems really detrimental to fuel consumption and the same for lower speeds, LOL

11 minutes ago, Genoa1893 said:

Two things come straightforward to me from your pictures: dusting seems really detrimental to fuel consumption and the same for lower speeds, LOL

Hmmm you may be onto something there! In the name of research I will try no dusting and driving faster for a while.... And see the results! 

On 10/08/2018 at 12:29, Genoa1893 said:

Two things come straightforward to me from your pictures: dusting seems really detrimental to fuel consumption and the same for lower speeds, LOL

Unfortunately this didn't match test results.... But longer distances helps with the consumption figures... Couldn't get more dusty today I'm afraid

Good for your pocket! My screen is way dustier but my consumption is much worse than yours

18 hours ago, BriBri said:

Unfortunately this didn't match test results.... But longer distances helps with the consumption figures... Couldn't get more dusty today I'm afraid

Average 51 mph and others higher. Itake it it was a throttle feathering cruise along a quiet dual carriageway? Same for all the high mpg posts on here.... I had a 184 diesel on loan and driving it on same speeds and  journeys as my VRS PFL 230 it averaged about 47 mpg roughly 7-8 more than my VRS