Carlston

14" rims clear 256x22mm front brake discs. 15" rims clear 288x25mm front brake discs. 16" rims clear 310x25mm front brake discs. The Fabia MK3 288x25mm front brake calipers are also used on the Audi A1 310x25mm front brakes. So just a change of front brake discs and front brake caliper carriers is needed, as the front brake calipers are the same. The OEM part number for the front brake caliper carriers for the 310x25mm front brakes on the Audi A1 2011- is 8X0615125A up to 13/04/2015 and 8X0615125C from 13/04/2015. You might be able to order these parts from a VAG parts department. It might be worth ordering the later version (ie. 8X0615125C) as they were both used on the same front brake calipers so 8X0615125A and 8X0615125C should be interchangeable. Audi A1 2011- 310x25mm front brakes https://www.lllparts.co.uk/catalogs/audi/RDW/A1/708/6/615/615035 310x25mm front brake caliper carrier 8X0615125C

Are your front disc brakes 256x22mm or 288x25mm? You might find that the Fabia MK3 with up to 95HP comes with 256x22mm front discs and from 110HP comes with 288x25mm front discs. If you've got rear disc brakes, they will be 230x9mm. Fabia MK3 parts catalogue https://www.lllparts.co.uk/catalogs/skoda/CZ/FAB/797/6/615/615050

The lightest rims 15 INCHES Part number Weight Size Center centering Lochkreis 8L0 601 025 E here. 5.7 kg 6J x 15H2 ET38 57,0 mm 5 x 100 8L0 601 025 M here. 5.7 kg 6J x 15H2 ET38 57,0 mm 5 x 100 8D0 601 025 D here. 5.5 kg 6J x 15H2 ET45 57,0 mm 5 x 112 8D0 601 025 M here. 6.6 kg 6J x 15H2 ET45 57,0 mm 5 x 112 4B0 601 025 N here. 5.7 kg 6J x 15H2 ET45 57,0 mm 5 x 112 8L0 601 025 D here. 5.7 kg 6J x 15H2 ET38 57,0 mm 5 x 100 4B0 601 025 A here. 5.7 kg 6J x 15H2 ET45 57,0 mm 5 x 112 4B0 601 025 J here. 5.7 kg 6J x 15H2 ET45 57,0 mm 5 x 112 16 INCHES Part number Weight Size Center centering Lochkreis 4D0 601 025 M here. 6.1 kg 7J x 16H2 ET42 57,0 mm 5 x 112 8W0 601 025 EF here. 7.0 kg 7J x 16H2 ET35 66,5 mm 5 x 112 8W0 601 025 here. 6.9 kg 7J x 16H2 ET35 66,5 mm 5 x 112 4D0 601 025 AA here. 6.1 kg 7J x 16H2 ET42 57,0 mm 5 x 112 17 INCH Part number Weight Size Center centering Lochkreis 8W0 601 025 C here. 8.7 kg 7,5J x 17H2 ET38 66,5 mm 5 x 112 8S0 601 025 here. 8.9 kg 8J x 17H2 ET47 57,0 mm 5 x 112 8W0 601 025 YES here. 8.5 kg 7,5J x 17H2 ET29 66,5 mm 5 x 112 4K0 071 497 here. 8.8 kg 7,5J x 17H2 ET36 66,5 mm 5 x 112 8J0 601 025 G here. 8.9 kg 7J x 17H2 ET47 57,0 mm 5 x 112 8D0 601 025 R here. 8.7 kg 7,5J x 17H2 ET43 57,0 mm 5 x 112 8L0 601 025 AC here. 8.7 kg 7J x 17H2 ET38 57,0 mm 5 x 100 8E0 601 025 AS here. 8.9 kg 7,5J x 17H2 ET45 57,0 mm 5 x 112 8N0 601 025 H here. 8.7 kg 7,5J x 17H2 ET32 57,0 mm 5 x 100 8E9 071 492 here. 8.4 kg 7,5J x 17H2 ET36 57,0 mm 5 x 112 18 INCHES Part number Weight Size Center centering Lochkreis 82A 601 025 AN here. 10.0 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET46 57,0 mm 5 x 100 5G0 601 025 CF here. 7.6 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET49 57,0 mm 5 x 112 5G0 601 025 UK here. 10.4 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET49 57,0 mm 5 x 112 5G0 601 025 AG here. 10.6 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET49 57,0 mm 5 x 112 5G0 071 498 A here. 10.6 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET51 57,0 mm 5 x 112 5G0 071 498 A here. 10.6 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET51 57,0 mm 5 x 112 5G0 601 025 DH here. 10.8 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET51 57,0 mm 5 x 112 5G0 601 025 G here. 10.7 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET49 57,0 mm 5 x 112 8N0 071 498 here. 10.8 kg 8J x 18H2 ET33 57,0 mm 5 x 100 7N0 601 025 P here. 10.8 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET35 57,0 mm 5 x 112 3AA 601 025 S here. 10.6 kg 8J x 18H2 ET40 57,0 mm 5 x 112 5H0 601 025 H here. 9.3 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET51 57,0 mm 5 x 112 1K0 601 025 BA here. 10.1 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET51 57,0 mm 5 x 112 1J0 601 025 AM here. 9.9 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET38 57,0 mm 5 x 100 1K0 601 025 AD here. 10.6 kg 7,5J x 18H2 ET51 57,0 mm 5 x 112 https://www.original-felgen.com/gewicht

Yes, the 205/55R16 helps to improve efficiency and fuel consumption by lowering the ride height. However, how you drive the car makes a much bigger difference than the relatively small difference 205/55R16 tyres make on the Yeti. One Yeti owner compared the 205/55R16 and 215/60R16 and found the ride much improved with the 215/60R16. As you can see in the chart below, 205/55R16 has a sidewall height of just under 4.5". 215/60R16 has a sidewall height of just over 5". 205/70R15 has a sidewall height of just over 5.5". So this perhaps emphasises that 205/70R15 will be the best off-road tyre out of these three tyre sizes. Sidewall height 205/55R16 112.75mm (4.44") 215/60R16 129.00mm (5.08") 205/70R15 143.50mm (5.65")

I can see from your photos that you have 205/55R16 tyres fitted to 7Jx16 ET45 5/112 57.1 alloy rims. Although Toot has mentioned looking at gravel tyres and/or tyres with reinforced sidewalls, etc., I would first look at tyres with much higher sidewalls than the low sidewalled 205/55R16 tyre size which really isn't very suitable for off-road use due to its low sidewall height. It doesn't help that the 205/55R16 is fitted to a relatively wide 7J rim. With your current rims you could change to 215/60R16. However, 7J is quite wide for 215/60R16 tyres. If you did want that tyre size, it might be better to fit the 215/60R16 tyre size to a narrower 6J rim...perhaps the 6Jx16 ET43 5/112 57.1 rim from the Karoq. But if you are going to change rims and tyres it might be better to look at the 205/70R15 option that I mentioned in my previous post. Bear in mind that the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 is cheaper in the 205/70R15 size compared to 215/60R16. Both the 205/70R15 and 215/60R16 tyre sizes would allow you to reduce your tyre pressures by at least 3psi because they are bigger tyres (and have higher standard load indexes, ie. 95 690kg and 96 710kg) so can support the same weight with less air pressure. Both the 205/70R15 and 215/60R16 should transform the off-road feel of the car compared to the too low sidewalled 205/55R16. However, you might prefer the on-road feel of the car with the 215/60R16 over the 205/70R15. So perhaps 205/70R15 being the better of the two off-road but the 215/60R16 being the better of the two on-road. It really depends how you drive the car and personal preference. Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 215/60R16 95H (All-Terrain tyre) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m62b0s111p164244/Yokohama_Tyres_Car_Yokohama_Geolandar_AT_G015_215_60_R16_95H_RPB_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_E_Wet_Grip%3A_C_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_71dB Alcar 6665 6Jx16 ET43 5/112 57.1 steel rim (from Karoq) https://www.mytyres.co.uk/rims/details?vehicleId=1302234084152546416&rimCode=ALCAR6665

What size tyres are fitted to your Greenline? For example, the size might be 205/55R16 or 215/60R16. What make and model of tyres have been getting punctures? What is causing the punctures? Is it something like a nail or screw? Or maybe something sharp has been cutting the sidewalls. Are tyre sizes listed on the inside of the fuel filler flap? If so, what tyre sizes are these? Do you run much reduced tyre pressures when driving on Salisbury Plain? If you have 205/55R16, these may not be suitable for running reduced tyre pressures off-road because for an off-road tyre this size doesn't have enough sidewall height...which is why proper off-roaders tend to have lots of sidewall height. Whatever tyre size you've got at the moment, you could fit 205/70R15 on 6Jx15 ET43 5/112 57.1 rims. 15" tyres aren't generally fitted to the Yeti, but 195/65R15 91T is mentioned for the Yeti 1.2 petrol 77kW/105PS with lowered ride height on page 194 of the November 2014 edition of the Yeti owner's manual. You can see an online version of this owner's manual by downloading it here... Skoda owner's manual https://manual.skoda-auto.com/210/en-gb/Models 205/70R15 is simply what I would call a ballooned version of the 195/65R15 tyre size, ie. one size up on the width and one size up on the aspect ratio. Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 205/70R15 96H (Euro label E C 70dB) (3PMSF) (All-Terrain tyre and All-Season tyre) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m53b0s2481p148166/Yokohama_Tyres_Car_Yokohama_Geolandar_AT_G015_205_70_R15_96H_RPB_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_E_Wet_Grip%3A_C_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_70dB If the mud isn't wet, you might be able to get away with a more road biased tyre such as the Vredestein Quatrac 5...which is an all-season tyre. Vredestein Quatrac 5 205/70R15 96T (Euro label C C 69dB) (3PMSF) (All-Season tyre) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m138b0s7998p144823/Vredestein_Tyres_All_Season_Car_Vredestein_Quatrac5_Vredestein_Quatrac_5_205_70_R15_96T_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_C_Wet_Grip%3A_C_NoiseClass%3A_A_Noise%3A_69dB Alcar 7755 6Jx15 ET43 5/112 57.1 steel rim (from Octavia MK3) https://www.oponeo.pl/felga-stalowa/alcar-kfz-7755 https://www.mytyres.co.uk/rims/details?vehicleId=502374009556452464&rimCode=ALCAR7755

The Yokohama Geolandar G015 is the one that I would choose if I needed a mud capable tyre for road use. From one review, it appears to be one of the most comfortable All-Terrain tyres on the market, has good wet grip, and isn't too noisy. However, I don't need wet mud capability, so would choose a better road tyre such as the Vredestein Quatrac 6. That's the problem with tyres. When they are better in one area they tend to lose out in others areas. So whatever you choose, it's always a compromise. Vredestein Quatrac 6 215/65R16 98H (Euro label C B 71dB) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m139b0s8008p202133/Vredestein_Tyres_All_Season_Car_Vredestein_Quatrac_6_215_65_R16_98H_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_C_Wet_Grip%3A_B_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_71dB

Just to add to the above post, the 16" Alcar 9922 steel rim weighs 8.20kg, as shown below. This is over 40% heavier than the 17" Alcar 9021 steel rim, or 3.38kg heavier. So five of these 17" steel rims would weigh 16.9kg more than these 16" steel rims. These 17" steel rims really are shockingly heavy, so another reason to choose 16" steel rims in preference to 17" steel rims. Alcar 9922 6.5x16 ET33 5/112 57.1 steel rim 8.20kg Alcar 9021 6.5Jx17 ET38 5/112 57.1 steel rim 11.58kg Bear in mind that the 17" alloy equivalents as shown on "skoda eshop cz" weigh an almost identical 11.5kg, so 17" alloy rims won't help with the weight problem of 17" rims. 6.5Jx17 ET38 5/112 57.1 alloy rim (from Kodiaq) (11.5kg) https://eshop.skoda-auto.cz/cs_CZ/alu-kolo-nanuq-17-kodiaq/p/565071497++8Z8

Vredestein Quatrac 6 185/55R15 82H (Euro label C B 70dB) (3PMSF) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m138b0s7988p202142/Vredestein_Tyres_All_Season_Car_Vredestein_Quatrac_6_185_55_R15_82H_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_C_Wet_Grip%3A_B_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_70dB

If you are going to be driving on soft mud, you may want to reduce your tyre pressures by about one-third, ie. if you normally run 30psi-36psi you might want to reduce them to 20psi-24psi...but remember to pump them back up as soon as you get back on the tarmac to prevent the tyres from over-heating. Because you might want to reduce the tyre pressures when driving on soft mud, it's much better to have 16" tyres rather than 17" tyres because the 16" tyres can have more sidewall height than the 17" tyres. For example, a 215/65R16 has 10.75mm more sidewall height than a 215/60R17. Running low profile tyres off-road with reduced tyre pressures will make the rims far more likely to get damaged, hence it's better to go for 16" tyres rather then 17" tyres. Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 215/65R16 98H (Euro label E C 70dB) (3PMSF) (All-Terrain tyre) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m62b0s426p148189/Yokohama_Tyres_Car_Yokohama_Geolandar_AT_G015_215_65_R16_98H_RPB_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_E_Wet_Grip%3A_C_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_70dB Alcar 9922 6.5x16 ET33 5/112 57.1 steel rims (from VW Tiguan MK1 and VW Touran MK2) https://www.oponeo.pl/felga-stalowa/alcar-kfz-9922 https://www.mytyres.co.uk/rims/details?vehicleId=62269191771657328&rimCode=ALCAR9922 Outside diameter of tyres 225/50R17 656.8mm 215/60R16 664.4mm 215/65R16 685.9mm (+3.2% compared to 215/60R16 and +4.4% compared to 225/50R17) 215/60R17 689.8mm (+3.8% compared to 215/60R16 and +5.0% compared to 225/50R17) Out of the above four tyre sizes, 215/65R16 tends to be by far the most economical tyre size, which is another plus point in this tyre size's favour. If you go for 215/60R17, then 6.5Jx17 ET38 rims (from the Kodiaq) would be a better option than the 7Jx17 ET45 rims. Bear in mind that these 17" steel rims weigh a lot more than the 16" steel rims. Another negative point for the 17" wheels is that in general 215/60R17 cost a lot more than 215/65R16. And yet another negative point, is that the 215/60R17 has an outside diameter even bigger than 215/65R16...making the gearing even further out from standard. Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 215/60R17 96H (Euro label E C 71dB) (3PMSF) (All-Terrain tyre) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m54b0s3735p164247/Yokohama_Tyres_Car_Yokohama_Geolandar_AT_G015_215_60_R17_96H_RPB_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_E_Wet_Grip%3A_C_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_71dB Alcar 9021 6.5Jx17 ET38 5/112 57.1 steel rim (from Kodiaq) (this rim weighs 11.58kg) https://www.oponeo.pl/felga-stalowa/alcar-kfz-9021 https://www.mytyres.co.uk/rims/details?vehicleId=639488607098401904&rimCode=ALCAR9021

With the 8Jx19 ET45 Karoq rim, 245/40R19 would offer more protection from kerbing damage than either 225/40R19 or 235/40R19. So fitting 245/40R19 to your standard 8Jx19 ET45 Karoq rims is something you might want to consider if protecting these rims from kerbing damage is a high priority. As well as the 235/40R19 fitted to a 7.5Jx19 ET48 rim from the Octavia MK4 that I mentioned in a previous post, another option could be 225/45R19 fitted to a 7Jx19 ET43 rim from the Kodiaq. An example of a 7Jx19 ET43 rim from the Kodiaq is shown below. Karoq 8Jx19 ET45 alloy rims CRATER https://eshop.skoda-auto.cz/cs_CZ/alu-kolo-crater-19-karoq/p/57A071499A+8Z8 Kodiaq 7Jx19 ET43 alloy rims CRATER https://eshop.skoda-auto.cz/cs_CZ/alu-kolo-crater-19-kodiaq/p/565071499H+8Z8 I've added 225/45R19 and 245/40R19 to my "Outside diameter of tyres" chart. 225/45R19 and 245/40R19 aren't standard tyre sizes on the Karoq 2WD but they are standard tyre sizes on the Karoq 4WD. A 225/45R19 fitted to a 7J rim will have a similar amount of protection from kerbing damage as a 235/40R19 fitted to a 7.5J rim. With the standard 8Jx19 ET45 Karoq rims, fitting 245/40R19 should give some protection from kerbing damage, but it won't be as good as a 225/45R19 fitted to a 7J rim or a 235/40R19 fitted to a 7.5J rim. Outside diameter of tyres 215/60R16 664.4mm 215/55R17 668.3mm 215/50R18 672.2mm 225/40R19 662.6mm 235/40R19 670.6mm 225/45R19 685.1mm (1.9% bigger outside diameter than 215/50R18) 245/40R19 678.6mm (1.0% bigger outside diameter than 215/50R18)

Many VW Up! owners have changed their standard 195/40R17 on 6.5J rims to slightly oversize 205/40R17 on the same 6.5J rims. That's also only a 4mm difference in sidewall height, but the owners seem to like the improvement in ride, rim protection from kerbing and pothole damage, and looks. Part of the difference also has to do with the 6.5J rim becoming relatively narrower for the 205/40 tyre size compared to the 195/40 tyre size, not just the increase in sidewall height. Fitting a tyre to a relatively narrower rim improves ride comfort...all other things being equal...as the sidewalls flex more easily. Notice in the below chart, that 235/40R18 has an outside diameter 0.8% bigger than 225/35R19 and 1.3% bigger than 225/40R18. Up to a 1.5% difference is usually considered insignificant. Outside diameter of tyres 225/40R18 637.2mm 235/40R18 645.2mm (+0.8% compared to 225/35R19, and +1.3% compared to 225/40R18) 225/35R19 640.1mm

It won't add to the looks, but have you considered Bilstein B8 shock absorbers? These are quite special, because they are a mono-tube design...unlike the normal twin-tube design that the Bilstein B4 shock absorbers use. Surprisingly, even the expensive DCC (electronically adjustable) shock absorbers use the cheaper and inferior twin-tube design.

If that's 2WD rather than 4WD, it will probably have 225/40R19 or 235/40R19 fitted to rather wide 8Jx19 ET45 rims. You can see in the "Skoda alloy rims...accessories catalogue" that both 225/40R19 and 235/40R19 are Skoda approved tyre sizes for the Karoq 2WD. These are very vulnerable to kerbing damage because the tyre sidewalls don't bulge out much, if at all. Changing to 235/40R19 fitted to 7.5Jx19 ET48 rims from the Octavia MK4 would give much better protection from kerbing damage. 235/40R19 is a standard Superb MK3 tyre size. 7.5Jx19 ET48 alloy rim (from Octavia MK4) https://eshop.skoda-auto.cz/cs_CZ/alu-kolo-manaslu-19-octavia-iv/p/5E3071499H+HA7 Notice how similar the above Octavia MK4 alloy rim looks to the below Karoq 8Jx19 ET45 alloy rim https://eshop.skoda-auto.cz/cs_CZ/alu-kolo-crater-19-karoq/p/57A071499++HA7 Another benefit of the 235/40R19 tyre size over the 225/40R19 is that a Michelin CrossClimate 2 tyre is available in an H speed rating. The 225/40R19 size only has a Y speed rated Michelin CrossClimate 2, which is way over-rated for the Karoq. So 235/40R19 would not only provide much better rim protect to a relatively narrow 7.5J rim compared to a 225/40R19 fitted to an 8J rim, but the ride comfort would be much better...and yet still with the 19" rim size that so many appear to prefer on the Karoq. Michelin CrossClimate 2 235/40R19 96H XL (Euro label B B 71dB) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m142b0s10015p208572/Michelin_Tyres_All_Season_Car_Michelin_Cross_Climate_2_235_40_R19_96H_XL_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_B_Wet_Grip%3A_B_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_71dB Another thing to consider is the outside diameter of the tyres, as shown in the below chart. As you can see, 225/40R19 is rather small compared to the standard Karoq 2WD 17" and 18" tyre sizes, but 235/40R19 is in between the 17" and 18" tyre sizes...so a very good match to the standard Karoq 2WD tyre sizes. Outside diameter of tyres 215/60R16 664.4mm 215/55R17 668.3mm 215/50R18 672.2mm 225/40R19 662.6mm 235/40R19 670.6mm Skoda alloy rims (accessories catalogue) https://www.skoda.co.uk/_doc/639a0118-4da5-446b-a786-86e1f789b57b

Try changing the 225/40R18 tyres to 235/40R18. This will increase the sidewall height by 4mm (comparing new tyres to news tyres) so there could be up to 10mm difference in sidewall if comparing worn 225/40R18 to new 235/40R18. The edge of the tyre tread of the 235/40 tyre size should also extend by about 5mm each side compared to 225/40, thereby better filling the wheelarches. 235/40R18 would also increase ride comfort and better protect the rims from kerbing damage, plus having a little more sidewall height will give a little more protection from pothole damage. Choosing summer touring tyres over UHP (Ultra High Performance) tyres will also help ride comfort because the tyres' sidewalls will be softer and more flexible. Notice in the below example that this tyre isn't XL and the speed rating isn't Y, ie. the tyre isn't overspecified for the Octavia MK3 VRS...which again helps to improve ride comfort. You might also find that the weight of this tyre is also a little less by not being overspecified compared to the same size tyre with an XL load index and a Y speed rating. Michelin Primacy 4+ 235/40R18 91W (Euro label C A 69dB) (summer touring tyre) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m61b0s322p213489/Michelin_Tyres_Car_Michelin_Primacy_4%2B_235_40_R18_91W_RG_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_C_Wet_Grip%3A_A_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_69dB Notice is the following example that the load index is XL and the speed rating is Y. Also notice that the noise rating is 72dB. Although the Pilot Sport 5 is highly rated for an UHP tyre, the summer touring tyre will be more refined. Bear in mind that the summer touring tyre will still give very high performance because of it's wide and low profile size. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 235/40R18 95Y XL (Euro label C A 72dB) (UHP tyre) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m61b0s322p209253/Michelin_Tyres_Car_Michelin_Pilot_Sport_5_PS5_235_40_R18_(95Y)_XL_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_C_Wet_Grip%3A_A_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_72dB

On the Superb MK3 280HP, the speed rating of the tyres will be either W (168mph) or Y (186mph) unless they are winter rated where the speed rating might only be V (150mph). So I wouldn't call the national speed limit (for dual carriageways) of 70mph fast in relation to the speed capability of the tyres. 150mph on the German autobahn and the tyres are starting to get closer to their design limit, but 70mph really isn't fast for a W/Y speed rated tyre.

As well as the 15" tyre being quieter (and more comfortable), when it comes to tyre replacement time, the 185/65R15 is a much cheaper tyre size than the 195/55R16 and 215/45R17 options on the Fabia MK4.

On camskill, if you add a tyre to the basket and click the basket, it tells you the postage. It looks like it's £5.75/tyre with a minimum postage of £11.50. So if you order at least two tyres, it works out at £5.75 each tyre for postage.

You can fit AGM instead of EFB. AGM is better quality than EFB and should last considerably longer. You might have to code the new battery, although you would need to ask someone else about that.

Try wheel-size.com https://www.wheel-size.com/size/skoda/fabia/2006/#trim-mk1-6y-1999-2007-eudm-12i--63 It looks like the Fabia MK1 can use either 185/55R15 or 195/50R15 fitted to a 6Jx15 ET43 rim. However, the ride will be noticeably better on 175/65R14 fitted to 5Jx14 ET35 rims. As you can see on the link below, 175/65R14 is a very economical tyre size. There aren't many 5Jx14 ET35 5/100 57.1 alloy rims, but the facelift version of the VW Polo MK4 did offer one alloy rim design in this specification called JEREZ...as shown in the link below. Vredestein Quatrac 5 175/65R14 82T (3PMSF) (all-season tyre) https://www.camskill.co.uk/m137b0s7973p211538/Vredestein_Tyres_All_Season_Car_Vredestein_Quatrac5_Vredestein_Quatrac_5_165_65_R14_79T_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_D_Wet_Grip%3A_C_NoiseClass%3A_B_Noise%3A_69dB Alcar 5210 5Jx14 ET35 5/100 57.1 steel rim https://www.mytyres.co.uk/rims/details?vehicleId=180852620338926692&rimCode=ALCAR5210 VW Polo MK4 facelift 5Jx14 ET35 5/100 57.1 alloy rim JEREZ 2 6Q0601025AC Aluminium rim JEREZ 5Jx14 ET35 5/100 57.1 6Q0601025AC 8Z8 Diamond silver https://www.lllparts.co.uk/catalogs/vw/RDW/PO/657/6/601/601050

This might be suitable, but do check yourself to make sure it is correct. You can use the Varta battery finder, on Varta's website. Varta Silver Dynamic AGM 570 901 076 Model: 570 901 076 Capacity: 70Ah CCA: 760A Width: 175mm Length: 278mm Height: 190mm Short Code: A7 UK Code: 096AGM https://www.varta-automotive.com/en-gb/battery-finder?type=pc&year=2016&make=106&model=14018&engine=112394&etn=570+901+076|&rec_etn=570+901+076|&ss_etn=570+901+076|&literal_search={"type"%3A"Passenger+Car"%2C"year"%3A"2016"%2C"make"%3A"SKODA"%2C"model"%3A"SUPERB+III+(3V3)"%2C"engine"%3A"2.0+TDI+(110+kW+%2F+150+PS)"}

Tyres will be cheaper on the Superb MK2 because it uses the common 205/55R16, 225/45R17, and 225/40R18 tyre sizes. For example, 225/55R16 can cost over 70% more than 205/55R16 tyres. Unfortunately, many Superb MK2's are fitted with 225/40R18 tyres which are quite susceptible to pothole damage due to their low sidewall height (sidewall height is only about 3.5" on the 225/40R18 tyre size). By comparison, the sidewall height on a 205/55R16 tyre is almost 4.5" which gives much better resistance to pothole damage and much better ride quality.

So you have build code L16 which means the front springs have OEM part number 5Q0411105HC, and build codes 1JE+0YC which means you have rear springs with OEM part number 5Q0511115P. I've listed 5Q0511115Q below as well as 5Q0511115P, because this could be a cheaper alternative to 5Q0511115P as it appears to be only about 6mm longer with about the same stiffness. Being 6mm longer could be an advantage, because sometimes when owners fit 4 new springs the front end can end up looking slightly higher than the rear end. This for many is not a good look. So a 6mm longer rear spring might help, but I've no idea whether fitting the below 5Q0411105HC front springs and 5Q0511115P rear springs would make the front end look slightly high compared to the rear end. However, I would probably go for the below Japko springs as I believe they are rebranded KYB springs (ie. identical...notice how the 1107 and 7156 part numbers are repeated in both the KYB springs and the Japko springs)...so you get KYB quality at a much better price. I believe Ashika and Japanparts are also rebranded KYB springs as again they use very similar part numbers and where quoted the specifications such as length, wire diameter, and outside diameter, are always identical. The photos always seem to be identical on Japko, Ashika, and Japanparts...which is another give away to the fact or strong suspicion that they are identical springs. 5Q0411105HC front springs KYB RA1107 Japko ZCJ1107A (same as KYB RA1107, but can be much cheaper) https://www.autodoc.co.uk/car-parts/oem/5q0411105hc?search=OEN 5Q0411105HC&supplier[0]=85&supplier[1]=10914 5Q0511115P rear springs Sachs 994 924 https://www.autodoc.co.uk/sachs/13786055 5Q0511115Q rear springs KYB RA7156 Japko ZCJ7156A (same as KYB RA7156, but can be much cheaper) https://www.autodoc.co.uk/car-parts/oem/5q0511115q?search=OEN 5Q0511115Q&supplier[0]=85&supplier[1]=10914

The OEM part numbers for the springs depends on the car's build codes as shown below. Octavia MK3 2.0TDI VRS hatchback 2WD Front springs for manual gearbox 5Q0411105HC or 5Q0411105HD Front springs for automatic gearbox 5Q0411105HD or 5Q0411105HE or 5Q0411105HF Rear springs 5Q0511115P or 5Q0511115Q Front springs 1 5Q0411105HC Coil spring 1 paint mark 1 paint mark green Grey 2 PR-L16 1 5Q0411105HD Coil spring 1 paint mark 1 paint mark brown white 2 PR-L17 1 5Q0411105HE Coil spring 1 paint mark 1 paint mark brown yellow 2 PR-L18 1 5Q0411105HF Coil spring 1 paint mark 1 paint mark brown orange 2 PR-L19 Rear springs 1 5Q0511115P Coil spring 2 PR-1JE+0YC 1 5Q0511115Q Coil spring 2 PR-1JE+0YD

I've removed the link. It's not important, as it was just the latest version of the Kamiq owner's manual.