It must be frustrating for all the pro photographers as already mentioned. But I doubt my Fabia on TT comps will be classed as good enough to be sold!

Mehehehe

You could use steganography to plant offensive messages inside pictures to feck with the companies 'stealing' pictures.

Only works if someone bothers to try and read it back though, which is unlikely.

As far as I'm concerned only "hipsters" use Instagram anyway. The "pro photographers" I know use Flickr, which seems far more geared around actual photography than the "take **** pic, add **** lens flare, upload, share on Facebook" approach of Instagram.

I've not used it for ages anyway as it always crashes my phone when applying the filters.

Phil

Apparently they have now decided not to revise the T&C's and those will remain as they were at launch in 2010 for the foreseeable future.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20810344

Too late and tbh not really bothered. With Twitter providing an almost identical service now I don't see the point of it.

Facebook have been using user photos in ads for ages, nothing new tbh