the camera is £50 cheaper believe it or not .

As it should be. When you were taught to drive your instructor would have insisted you look over your shoulder. Not down at a poncy little screen that won't show that kid/dog/trolley/whatever about to run across your path. Audible parking sensors are all you need IMO.

As it should be. When you were taught to drive your instructor would have insisted you look over your shoulder. Not down at a poncy little screen that won't show that kid/dog/trolley/whatever about to run across your path. Audible parking sensors are all you need IMO.

not dis agreeing i have them fitted to my fl vrs and they are great , was just wandering how good the cameras are

not dis agreeing i have them fitted to my fl vrs and they are great , was just wandering how good the cameras are

Sorry didn't mean to single you out like that was more a general comment on reversing cameras.

Sorry didn't mean to single you out like that was more a general comment on reversing cameras.

no problem that what is whats good about the forumn , you get peoples different opinions and it helps you make a judgement

A lot of modern cars are hard to see out the back so they help. They are no replacement for sensors or driving ability!

However both our cars have rear sensors and camera, and it's a very useful addition as you can see so much more it really helps with manoeuvring as you can get closer than you might dare with just sensors, helps in tricky tight situations.

Just put the vrs tdi estate dsg in for a new scout dsg. Lost 10k in 2 years and only done 12000 miles. The car is immaculate. So I have opted to take the hire deal. This frees up more options in 2 years. This was my 2nd vrs but they are outpaced by the competition. Dealers generally take the pee and the 0% is not doing the part ex deals any favours. Who wants a 2 year old car with interest payments. Skoda need to rethink, me thinks