Total theft (stolen vehicle): 2.000 €
Partial theft (parts stolen): 2.000 € (exemption 200 €)
Damages from a thief: 3.000 € (exemption 200 €)
Audio system: 400 € (exemption 200 €)
Locks damages: 400 € (exemption 200 €)
Fires from strikes-demonstrations (vandalism): 2.000 € (exemption 300 €)

Material damage from an uninsured vehicle: 6.000 €
Broken glass (windows, windshields etc): 1.000 € (exemption 150 €)

Natural damages (hail, floods, etc.): 2.000 € (exemption 300 €)

4 minutes ago, D.FYLAKTOS said:

Fires from strikes-demonstrations (vandalism

You lack the most important coverage which is bad will actions 

Which in your insurance is?

Allianz 

3 hours ago, Thefeliciahacker said:

which is bad will actions 

 

Yes you mention it avove about Allianz and i post about the Anyway programme.

So the compensation limit is?

The exception amount is?

 

Mine are:

Damages from a thief: 3.000 € (exemption 200 €)
Audio system stolen: 400€ (exemption 200 €)
Locks damages: 400 € (exemption 200 €)
Fire from terrorist action: 2.000 €
Fires from strikes-demonstrations (vandalism): 2.000 € (exemption 300 €)

Material damage from the spread of fire: 10.000 €

Broken glass (windows, windshields etc): 1.000 € (exemption 150 €)

Record theft (documents of the car): 200 €

Exemption of 200 euros is great. 

Compensation amounts are small. 

No bad will actions is a big foul 

1 hour ago, Thefeliciahacker said:

 

No bad will actions is a big foul 

 

Transalte this to Greek because i don't understand what you mean.

Write the specific term that you had in your insurance contract that i have not.

Bad will actions - vandalism(?).

13 hours ago, nta16 said:

Bad will actions - vandalism(?).

 

https://www.briskoda.net/forums/topic/523298-im-back/?do=findComment&comment=5851914

 

These aren't?

What we must add, key scratches-knife stabbing-pistol shooting-door kicking?

 

It should be explicitly stated

So if someone scratches heavily your door at night you wont get nothing from the insurance because the cost for a Felicia door (painting job) is about 180-200€

and that is beyond the exemption limit.

28 minutes ago, D.FYLAKTOS said:

So if someone scratches heavily your door at night you wont get nothing from the insurance because the cost for a Felicia door (painting job) is about 180-200€

and that is beyond the exemption limit.

yes but not if they (knock on wood) break your mirror
 

 

18 minutes ago, Thefeliciahacker said:

not if they (knock on wood) break your mirror
 

 

 

Why, how much you think will get from Allianz is someone broke your mirror?

Keep in mind that there is no original part anymore so only an aftermarket can be accepted from the insurance.

6 minutes ago, D.FYLAKTOS said:

Keep in mind that there is no original part anymore so only an aftermarket can be accepted from the insurance.

A similar to oem quality aftermarket electric wing mirror in Greece cost around 80-100 euros for the felicia and another 100 for painting. 

But I made this example mostly for the brera. For which an  electric folding and electronically adjustable mirror costs around 550 euros new 

Let's wait for your new insurance contract for FIVA Felicia and it's terms.

These photos are for @nta16 ,some of the British classic cars that we have here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They're obviously not used much, well the red cars at least, more show cars than go cars.

 

The 70s MGB is probably tartan red, whether it was originally is a different matter, over here and USA when they're restored they are painted tartan ("tarty")  red because that's the fashion with old farts and those very slightly younger as they think it's more traditional and it looks shiny.  They also very often convert them to shiny chrome wire wheels, even if the car originally had wire-wheels they'd have been painted not chrome.  Worst of all in my mind many screws on wooden panels on the black painted dash and vinyl door caps and anywhere else they can get a shiny bit of wood, and they are screwed on to the dash and glovebox, looks false and totally wrong to me but each to their own.

 

E-Type looks better as a coupe to me, and I prefer an earlier model, they go for stupid prices, bright red again of course.

 

Jag saloon looks nice, I very briefly thought about having a 5.3 V12 (pillarless) coupe for a short time just to improve the profits of il companies but they're so big for an old car, small and light by todays standards. 😁

 

Rollers are wedding cars over here and that type not as silly over-valued as you might think, you'd go for the Bentley version, and no VAG (plastic) parts all over it. 😁

 

In Greece you'd only wat to be in the soft-tops, even if the Jag or Roller have air-con (other than putting the windows down) I doubt it's very effective. - the owners think the cars are so precious that they can't leave the windows down in all that heat - or they can't trust the public.

 

The Mini or Beetle, and that green car whatever it is, would impress me much more, especially if they're actually used and driven and not just mobile display cars, I've seen enough shiny static cars to last me at least three lifetimes, cars are to be driven as designed.

  

90% of Aston Martins ever built are still in good condition.

 

Aston Martin celebrated its 110th anniversary last year.  While the British company has faced various difficulties in the past, its unbroken run is a testament to a thriving brand with a real influence on motoring developments.

And as if that wasn't enough, the British announced an incredible number: That 90% of Aston Martins ever built are still on the road.  The startling statistic was shared by head of product and market strategy, Alex Long, with reporters at an event in New York.

 

Aston Martin has built around 110,000 cars since it was founded in 1913. "A lot of countries live share the VIN of the models they maintain, so we can get a picture of what's out there and what's not," said Long. 

“Meanwhile, the vast majority of buyers want to protect the value of their cars and choose to maintain them at their main dealers.  So we're seeing VINs so old in the system, we thought we'd never see them again."

 

https://www.drive.gr/news/ki-omos-90-ton-aston-martin-kykloforoyn-akoma-ekei-exo

 

(Google translated)

Don't believe every thing you read particularly if it's from a journalist and even more so a motoring journalist, those rare check any facts and the magazine want to keep in with the car manufacturers and not upset their readership.  It may be 90% it may not, registered doesn't mean the car is on the road, some of them could be all over a garage/restorer's/AM's shed floors or facilities.  Many won't see the light of day much if at all.  All that stuff was about protecting brand and AM owners values.

 

Some of the models were never that popular and often difficult to keep on the road even if you wanted to, I should think a lot of any 90% is the more modern cars (that owners rarely use).

 

As a lad I lived 1-5 miles from the Newport Pagnell factory and when AM were doing good and/or got yet another new owner the craftsmen from Wolverton British Rail would leave BR and got to work for AM for more money to have to return to BR when AM inevitably got into trouble again, this meant they broke their pensionable service (the fable of the dog with a bone in its mouth that drops the bone because it's seen the reflection of a bone in water not realising the reflection is of the bone he formerly had in his mouth).

 

Not sure AM had an unbroken run and has had many owners in the past, not all British, with just about all losing lots of money owning it.

 

A famous story, no idea if it's true, IIRC, when David Brown (hence DB model numbers) owned it a friend asked if he could have the car at cost price and when it was built the friend's bill was a lot more than the usual retail sales price and he was told that was the cost price, they lost money on each car.

 

AM owners for a lot time have been in two groups, those that can afford them and those that thought they could afford them but can't or don't want to spend the necessary money to get them going and keep them going.

 

I went with a mate to look at an AM V8, they were unpopular at the time so low priced, IIRC Ford owned the company then so the modern cars at the time were getting better.  My mate never did get an AM but did get one of the first Jag XK 4.2 V8s in the county waiting for the ever promised F-Type that took many years more to appear by which time he'd learnt what a waste of money cars were, he did very sensibly buy a soft top so at least it was some fun.

 

 

    

King's Charles 1969 Aston Martin DB6 Mk II

 

https://www.foodandwine.com/king-charles-aston-martin-runs-on-cheese-and-wine-7496349

 

As for the Classic cars with the new status there would be a problem with the MOT.

Cars like the @Thefeliciahacker can pass easily but a 60's or 50's (there are some from 1922-1929 era) car based in which standards will be checked?

Emmisions, brakes, suspensions etc are out to date, there is no database so how can an engineer can give the "OK" and let it pass?

Do you mean in UK or Greece, I've no idea about Greece.

 

Charley boy's AM was given to him by his mum.  But I think I remember him driving another model AM later and it broke down from factory but my memory isn't the best and the internet swamps past info with trivia from more modern times so the history is effectively erased, history is written by the victor, or now lost in a sea of misinformation that AI will rely on.

 

10 minutes ago, nta16 said:

Do you mean in UK or Greece, I've no idea about Greece.

 

Charley boy's AM was given to him by his mum.  But I think I remember him driving another model AM later 

 

In Greece, how can a 1930 or 1950 can be inspected with the today's standards?

 

A 1994 V8 Vantage Volante?

6 minutes ago, D.FYLAKTOS said:

In Greece, how can a 1930 or 1950 can be inspected with the today's standards?

It can't, I've no idea what rules might apply in Greece.

 

 

7 minutes ago, D.FYLAKTOS said:

A 1994 V8 Vantage Volante?

No, no, many years before that, probably 70s or early 80s, he probably wanted a fast car to get between his women at the time, married or not, him and them.

 

In England a Classic car of 30's or 50's how passes the MOT?

Or they are not allowed to be in the road for every day driving as a modern car?

12 hours ago, D.FYLAKTOS said:

In England a Classic car of 30's or 50's how passes the MOT?

Cars that are 40 years old do not have to have MoT provided they have not been significantly alerted in (IIRC) the previous 10 years, the  form is a declaration by the owner/keeper.  They can be MoT'd in which case they must meet the requirements which are not retrospective and varied over the years, generally the older the car the less regulation. - https://www.gov.uk/guidance/mot-inspection-manual-for-private-passenger-and-light-commercial-vehicles/introduction

 

12 hours ago, D.FYLAKTOS said:

Or they are not allowed to be in the road for every day driving as a modern car?

This is a fear of some, that they will be restricted use at some point which is a complete laugh for some as they may have one or a fleet but the cars are rarely used on the road anyway, sunny Sunday afternoon cars.  A very few , like myself, insure for unrestricted mileage and use the old over-priced and overvalued car (which are called "classics") virtually everyday and drive it as it was designed to be driven and through all seasons including winter (as they were designed to do),

 

"Classic" insurance, even for unlimited mileage and everyday use is very inexpensive and you can insure for business use too - just like a real car. 😆