Question is regarding my first attempt at a photochop, and also does the car look good?

Good, but a little OTT...

It'd look pretty menacing when approaching from the rear... (ooo er, missus)

Something I don't like about it, can't place what it is, might look better with rectangular fogs? Would look cool if the headlights were a twin lamp conversion with one rectangular foglight either side...

not bad

Quite like it - looks better than most Fabias

It's a bit on the pish, Right clickimage, edit and rotate 45degrees.

Likewise on lights, I'd think about filling the space with glass, although thats possibly harder than two sides...question is, how much is a photochop

What rating are the lights anyway?

It would be better in black...

and with a BFOFMIC and a side mount numberplate

it costs 1bhp driving with the foglights on too... so thats 2bhp!

Looks good. But think I'd loose the fogs to help the SMIC. (not all of us have FMIC )

Plus I never use them.

Don't think he's made them out to be fogs....more 150w driving lamps is my thought.

Don't think he's made them out to be fogs....more 150w driving lamps is my thought.

You would be correct. No prizes today though, sorry.

Do it properly - you want a continuous line of fogs running along the bottom of the car. And maybe some neon washer jets while you're at it

Seriously tho - looks fine. Twin fogs look quite nice...

where do i sign for twin fogs??!!

Photoshop - Good.

Car actually looking like that - poo.

Change the 'bulbs' to bluevision lights or xenons...ALL of them...then I'll change my mind...ecause at the mo it loks nice but not too nice with the egg-yolk emittance..

and with a BFOFMIC and a side mount numberplate

You been spying on me?

why does it remind me of thunderbirds? :confused:

Not sure I should stick my 2 cents in here, cos I'm not really sure what the question is...

As I view it, there's a car coming straight at me in the foreground (no offset from direct eye-contact), and I'd just be happy if it did indeed slide off the brick paviours before it hit me :eek: Perhaps a little bit set back from the foreground?

As a thumbnail, it looks as if it's on fire with smoke coming out of the back - sure that's scenery in big scale, but what are you trying to achieve? A snazzy car, or a snazzy car in a location shot?

:confused:

Mo

Good, but bad.

Looks good to me

Not sure I should stick my 2 cents in here' date=' cos I'm not really sure what the question is...

As I view it, there's a car coming straight at me in the foreground (no offset from direct eye-contact), and I'd just be happy if it did indeed slide off the brick paviours before it hit me :eek: Perhaps a little bit set back from the foreground?

As a thumbnail, it looks as if it's on fire with smoke coming out of the back - sure that's scenery in big scale, but what are you trying to achieve? A snazzy car, or a snazzy car in a location shot?

:confused:

Mo[/quote']

The car's appearance has been modified from standard using an "image editing program", Mo. I think the question refers to the new extra lights, etc.

HTH

The car's appearance has been modified from standard using an "image editing program"' date=' Mo. I think the question refers to the new extra lights, etc.

HTH [/quote']

Hi Nick and thanks...

The post arrived directly after a photographic one - hence confusion since I didn't see a torch and duct tape for the lights

Still, Top Gear's on tonight - it's a learning curve you understand... :sofahide:

LOL

Mo

I like

Just the colour of the lights!! Can you make it 'xenon-ish'? All of it??? Because I think it looks fan-f*cking-tastic dude.

Thanks you guys, I've just checked the poll, and such is the voting, i might just see if i can really do it, but like mil says, a xenon look would be much nicer.

I looked into doing it Dave, but decided that it was silly attempting it with the SMIC. When I go FM, then I'll have another go!