Because i know Cheezemonkhai will be very grateful for this.

iTunes 9.2 is released

Here are the updates/improvements, mostly related to iSO4 and iPhone 4:

Sync with iPhone 4 to enjoy your favorite music, movies, TV shows, books and more on-the-go

Sync and read books with iPhone or iPod touch with iOS 4 and iBooks 1.1

Organize and sync PDF documents as books. Read PDFs with iBooks 1.1 on iPad and any iPhone or iPod touch with iOS 4

Organize your apps on your iOS 4 home screens into folders using iTunes

Faster back-ups while syncing an iPhone or iPod touch with iOS 4

Album artwork improvements make artwork appear more quickly when exploring your library

For information on the security content of this update, please visit: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222

Edited 17 June, 201016 yr by vRSCarl

Bit late mate, apple update on windows told me about this a few days ago.

I believe that's a dose of Fail!

Bit late mate, apple update on windows told me about this a few days ago.

I believe that's a dose of Fail!

Considering it was only released Yesterday at 18:00 i doubt that very much

So i reckon its you that has the dose of fail :giggle:

Edited 17 June, 201016 yr by vRSCarl

Considering it was only released Yesterday at 18:00 i doubt that very much

So i reckon its you that has the dose of fail :giggle:

I got an announcement on Sunday Night on my PC when I put a new PC in to rip.

Said updates are available to iTunes and went off and got it.

So sorry to disappoint.

I think I might start having to post threads for every Linux update and Windows update that comes out you know.

Edited 17 June, 201016 yr by cheezemonkhai

You are the only person in the World then that got iTunes 9.2 on Sunday.

It was only released yesterday at 1800 so it's impossible you got 9.2.

I updated my MBP to OS X 10.6.4 before 1800 yesterday and that never told me about iTunes 9.2. If it had been available since Sunday it would have. But as it only became available at 1800 yesterday thats why i only found out today :p

You probably got 9.1 if you were using a new PC

Check this link if you like

http://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=itunes+9.2+released&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&redir_esc=&ei=MfAZTIzRA6CT4gaRm7zGCg

Surely someone out of 574,000 results would also have it on Sunday if it was available.

So Sorry to disappoint you :p :p :p :p

On a side note - If you don't like these posts don't read them or reply to them no-one is forcing you to :p

They are not meant to offend anyone. They are there to let people know that there is an update.

It's not as if i am posting EVERY update. Mind you saying that with Apple products being superior they don't have to update as often as WinSh!t :giggle:

Edited 17 June, 201016 yr by vRSCarl

Anyone know if this is ok for JB yet?

If you are using Spirit then no but apparently if you are using RedSn0w or Pwnage then yes

See here

http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-news/714382-itunes-9-2-released-not-safe-spirit-jailbreakers.html

Now now boys - seeming as though you both appear to have a dose, I think you both better get yourselves off to the doctors soon as for the appropriate medication

I is cool Bryan B)

I just like winding Cheeze up as he bites so easily and can't admit when he is wrong :rofl:

If you are using Spirit then no but apparently if you are using RedSn0w or Pwnage then yes

See here

http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-news/714382-itunes-9-2-released-not-safe-spirit-jailbreakers.html

Cheers, already on JB so should be fine. Until I order iPhone 4 anyway. But that's a whole new problem.

I is cool Bryan B)

I just like winding Cheeze up as he bites so easily and can't admit when he is wrong :rofl:

Well I'd admit I was wrong, if I actually believed I was.

I will check the version number when I'm next at it.

i think you should Cheeze as you will only have 9.1 not 9.2 if you updated Sunday

Once you find you are wrong am i allowed to post a pic of you Kissing your Apple Products :rofl:

i think you should Cheeze as you will only have 9.1 not 9.2 if you updated Sunday

Once you find you are wrong am i allowed to post a pic of you Kissing your Apple Products :rofl:

Kiss of death mate on the apple products as Apples attitude and cost has made sure they won't get replaced with apple equipment unless there is a sound business reason.

I will check and I'm confident that it's not 9.1

One for the apple lovers, I've just have the pleasure of putting a Dual, Quad Core Mac Pro in the bin

One for the apple lovers, I've just have the pleasure of putting a Dual, Quad Core Mac Pro in the bin

Broken? Or just forgot to post it to me?

Well fish the damn thing out of the bin and send it to me (im serious btw)

Broken or not i'll have it. Got an idea and that will solve it for me

I'm confident your iTunes will be 9.1 :p

Edited 17 June, 201016 yr by vRSCarl

Broken? Or just forgot to post it to me?

Working but not fast enough for the task at hand (Multiple raw HD streams).

I agree it's a shame, but it takes up a lot of space, doesn't rack mount and everything has to be proven to have been recycled these days.

I did rip any useful bits out of it for use in other equipment (CPUs and RAM).

By the way, a serious suggestion on the apple/other updates. (Because trust me most the time I'm joking too)

Is it worth having a subsection to the tech shed for product notifications or something?

Edited 17 June, 201016 yr by cheezemonkhai

Working but not fast enough for the task at hand

See, if only you'd seen Carl's update post; you could have upgraded to 10.6.4 and kept it! Proof positive they're worth the space.

Is it worth having a subsection to the tech shed for product notifications or something?

That's a good idea.

There is a first for everything

ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz

ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz

WinSh!t :giggle:

As opposed to apple****?

Where's my iMac ......... oh it's back in the Apple Store again waiting for a "Genius" to loo at the vile piece of unreliable garbage.

using a loaner MBP at the moment, because my wonderful MBP's display adapter has failed, it's under applecare, but I still have to take it in and get a "genius" to look at it (who all seem to be clueless BTW)

Keep up the fanboyism ..... I get a chuckle out of it.

See, if only you'd seen Carl's update post; you could have upgraded to 10.6.4 and kept it! Proof positive they're worth the space.

I'm afraid not, it was dropping frames all over because it couldn't keep up with the data rate from the storage arrays attached to it.

A new plan is being formulated and will no doubt involve something with a built in memory controller.

As opposed to apple****?

Where's my iMac ......... oh it's back in the Apple Store again waiting for a "Genius" to loo at the vile piece of unreliable garbage.

using a loaner MBP at the moment, because my wonderful MBP's display adapter has failed, it's under applecare, but I still have to take it in and get a "genius" to look at it (who all seem to be clueless BTW)

Keep up the fanboyism ..... I get a chuckle out of it.

You know this is something I found so funny about the apple store. Their Geniarses.

I went in to get a mac at late notice for some work that required one.

Asking can they do it with 10GigE in and can they supply a module that would put two of these in a box.

What about other faster storage technology.

The genius consulted with other genii and told me that I didn't want 10GigE, I wanted fibre because fibre was faster.

Trying to explain to the guys that 10gigE can run over optical fibre as iut's just physical medium and the SFP+ dictates the interface was fun.

Even then, they told me that the fibre cards are faster.

Lots of talking about 4Gbits fibre being faster than 10Gbits Ethernet and they seemed to miss the key point.

Then to top it off tried to tell me how a storage enclosure worked, using as an example a product that I know very well for reasons obvious to anyone who knows my day job.

Was all rather pathetic and removed any genius tag very quickly.

Edited 17 June, 201016 yr by cheezemonkhai

I love the way you all slag apple off.

How many times have you had a problem with your glorious windows systems.

I used windows for 15 years and I can't recall ever having more than a couple of months of trouble free computing. It's not as if my computers were cheap either.

In the 2 years since switching to Apple I have not had one problem with either of my MBP.

We are all entitled to our opinions about stuff. Clearly for your needs (Tony, Cheeze) then a windows based computer suits your needs.

However for my needs and most other peoples normal computing needs then Apple computers are better in terms of reliability. For example I bought a new printer about 4 months back. I plugged it into my MBP and it worked straight away no waiting for installation of drivers. I plugged it in to Windoze 7 Ultimate on my Virtual Machine and I had to wait for 4 mins whilst the drivers were installed.

So what a few people have had problems with displays etc. That is going to happen to ANY technology that is mass produced.

I bet you can't show me one technology that has never had a problem, failure of some sort wether it be hardware or software.

It's great aswell slagging off the guys in the Genius bars. However in my experience they are a damn sight more knowledgeable than any so called expert I have ever seen in PC World.

You lot need to accept that ALL computers have there merits both good and bad. I'm not saying that Apple is perfect. I never have. You lot have just jumped on the "let's all slag Apple & their users" Bandwagon. Windows are highly customiseable which is a strength of their brand but also their downfall as this is probably were a lot of there problems lie. However Apple controlling what's allowed to work on their systems is their strength as they can use the marketing of "it just works". This again however is their downfall when people want to customise their systems and can't go as far as they want if Apple don't allow the software/hardware to work.

Which would you rather have

A - Cheaper car that is highly customisable and if you do customise it you may have to upgrade lots of other parts and also install software updates all the time.

B - more expensive car that has a defined set of upgrades that ,although are more expensive, you know you can fit them and they will work.

I know which I would rather have

At the end of the day we are all individuals and have different likes and dislikes. That's what makes humans interesting. If we all had the same opinion life would be pretty dull.

Edited 17 June, 201016 yr by vRSCarl

I love the way you all slag apple off.

How many times have you had a problem with your glorious windows systems.

Which one, I have had hundreds of windows systems that I run, and hundreds of Linux systems and short of one hickup that required a system repair I've been on.

The Apple Mac went back under apple care twice in the first two years and still has issues with a noisy video output.

Then there are the laptops that have issues not the mention I have to pay apple to change the battery on their laptops.

I used windows for 15 years and I can't recall ever having more than a couple of months of trouble free computing. It's not as if my computers were cheap either.

P.I.C.N.I.C.

In the 2 years since switching to Apple I have not had one problem with either of my MBP.

Works for me, you mean? Works for me != works for everyone.

Besides which I would expect apple kit to work, because they have a very limited hardware range to run on so a much more complete testing cycle is possible

Windows has to work on millions of different combinations and full testing is impossible. Most issues are down to third party drivers.

We are all entitled to our opinions about stuff. Clearly for your needs (Tony, Cheeze) then a windows based computer suits your needs.

We are, but you're incorrect as to my needs.

Linux does most of my work, with a windows laptop for various reasons and sometimes I have to use a Mac, because it is a requirement that things work with macs.

I and by the sounds of it Tony, don't feel they live up to their hype and quality reputation.

However for my needs and most other peoples normal computing needs then Apple computers are better in terms of reliability.

For example I bought a new printer about 4 months back. I plugged it into my MBP and it worked straight away no waiting for installation of drivers.

I plugged it in to Windoze 7 Ultimate on my Virtual Machine and I had to wait for 4 mins whilst the drivers were installed.

The printer on the apple will be running a generic driver built into the OS.

I won't mention the effort it takes to get HP colour laserjets on a network "just working" with the mac

The Windows 7 (sorry you appear to have picked up fanboi spelling) machine is running on a virtual machine, which oddly enough will actually slow down things such as driver installs as the driver is installed onto a virtual device that has to be created first.

Even if you accept the increased time, it's a one off incident that is covered by the fact you can't have all drivers for all things.

The HP printers I have all "just work" in vista onwards and many in XP too.

So what a few people have had problems with displays etc. That is going to happen to ANY technology that is mass produced.

I bet you can't show me one technology that has never had a problem, failure of some sort wether it be hardware or software.

No system has no problems, it is how the manufacturer deals with it.

Lots of people with the mac mini gen1 had display issues that were not fixed FoC, lots of people with the iMac have had issues.

Also what about the time capsule devices, that took design over getting rid of the heat, worked for a while then died (unacceptable for a backup device)

I don't have an issue with a few failures, I have an issue for the quality image put forward, the price premium paid for the products and the response to claims of problems.

I have to say that I think that the mass produced modern laptops are at least as good quality as the Macs. (many of the same internals anyway)

It's great aswell slagging off the guys in the Genius bars. However in my experience they are a damn sight more knowledgeable than any so called expert I have ever seen in PC World.

Ahh yes, but the PC world bod doesn't claim to be a "GENIUS" just a sales person.

Personal experience, but I'd far rather deal with a guy an an apple approved retailer than an apple store.

Problem is the apple stores seem to be at the expense of the approved retailers.

You lot need to accept that ALL computers have there merits both good and bad.

I'm not saying that Apple is perfect. I never have.

No, but you have jumped on the they are better bandwagon.

If you have hard facts to back this up, please publish them in an open forum and I'll happily retract my statement if I can not dispute them with facts.

You lot have just jumped on the "let's all slag Apple & their users" Bandwagon.

Erm no

Windows are highly customiseable which is a strength of their brand but also their downfall as this is probably were a lot of there problems lie.

However Apple controlling what's allowed to work on their systems is their strength as they can use the marketing of "it just works".

This again however is their downfall when people want to customise their systems and can't go as far as they want if Apple don't allow the software/hardware to work.

I don't disagree with this point, but apple have gone far to far with this now IMHO.

Which would you rather have

A - Cheaper car that is highly customisable and if you do customise it you may have to upgrade lots of other parts and also install software updates all the time.

B - more expensive car that has a defined set of upgrades that ,although are more expensive, you know you can fit them and they will work.

I know which I would rather have

Indeed you picked A, because you drive a modded skoda, not an Audi RS4 or a BMW M3/M5 or an AMG Merc.

Besides which if A is 50% of the price of B and with 25% of the overall cost of buying A, you could do all the work you needed and pay the extras, then you're still quids in. (75% of B still)

Obviously you have to assume the car (like a computer) goes in the bin after n years

At the end of the day we are all individuals and have different likes and dislikes. That's what makes humans interesting. If we all had the same opinion life would be pretty dull.

You are correct, but this doesn't excuse the fact that everything apple is in your book "better for most people".

People have a price point on things and also an acceptable quality level.

If apple PC's were so good, then business would be using them en-mass after the debarcle that was windows vista.

So obviously you also have to accept that people are not slagging off apple of the genii, they are making statements based on the facts in front of them.

Obviously you like your enlarged iPod Touch, and your mac book, and everything else apple you have.

Others obviously like the apple range too.

That's fine.

I (and others) on the other hand don't see the value of the current apple range.

I'm sorry to say this Carl, but I find it funny that you get up and assume we are making an affront on apple and their staff rather than just a set of comments based on our experiences of them

At the same time use terms such as windoze and slag off retail staff for not knowing everything.

Anyway, I doubt there is much point us going on any further as it's clear we don't see eye to eye on this.

I'm happy to accept that fact.

Edited 17 June, 201016 yr by cheezemonkhai

Indeed you picked A, because you drive a modded skoda, not an Audi RS4 or a BMW M3/M5 or an AMG Merc.

If i could afford to spend that much money on a car then i would have one of the above

You are correct, but this doesn't excuse the fact that everything apple is in your book "better for most people".

Erm i said better for most people in terms of reliability. Which is my personal experience (see further point below). Selective editing is great

People have a price point on things and also an acceptable quality level.

If apple PC's were so good, then business would be using them en-mass after the debarcle that was windows vista.

I would suggest part of the reason business don't use them is because of the popularity of MS in the first place and the fact that they are customiseable (a point i made of being a strength)

So obviously you also have to accept that people are not slagging off apple of the genii, they are making statements based on the facts in front of them.

So am i with my statements about windows.

Obviously you like your enlarged iPod Touch, and your mac book, and everything else apple you have.

Others obviously like the apple range too.

That's fine.

We agree their then