R Tech maps are quite aggressive so that type of torque curve is expected. Some mappers set a progressive power curve that the torque is spread across a wider rev range. Some folks prefer that as the power last for longer but is not such a hit like a aggressive map.

Please show pic's, but I still say a Forge, SPS, Autobahn88, Samco, CM etc are all the same size if you are to fit to a STD VRS MAF which is 2.5". I am happy to be proved wrong though.

As stated they probably were comparing a STD 2.5" TIP with a 3" TIP which is obviously different and will not fit your STD MAF.

The fact it fit's to a K03s turbo is not the issue as all they have done is modify to a smaller neck to the turbo side instead of a K04 fitment but the other end is 3" and needs a different MAF, if that makes sense.

Unless they have modified both ends on a K04 turbo TIP to fit a K03s on Turbo side and on MAF side it won't fit our cars.

Oh dear maybe you are best doing some homework on R-Tech have you even heard of TIV+ mapping? No thought not.

Its also not power for longer surely? Its less peak torque then similar or less torque across the rev range?

I can only speak for my old set up on my Ibiza but had very high peak torque figures which looking next to any other map either made the same torque later on as any other map, or still more.

Doesnt that make it faster? :/

400Nm will kill your stock internals very fast, also there`s a rumor going on that your UK dynos are a bit optimistic.

I think someone is mistaking R-Tech for revo

Aggressive maps and over inflated numbers are absolute rubbish.

Custom maps are as aggressive as the customer wants, its all about the area under the curve.

As for all silicone tips are the same, utter b***ox, the differences are massive.

Have you done any testing and seen any other products side by side ?

I think someone is mistaking R-Tech for revo

Aggressive maps and over inflated numbers are absolute rubbish.

Custom maps are as aggressive as the customer wants, its all about the area under the curve.

As for all silicone tips are the same, utter b***ox, the differences are massive.

Have you done any testing and seen any other products side by side ?

Wondered if you were going to pop in here now you have an Octy

yeah baby, I'm back in the game

For those that don't know, I'm the owner of the fastest and most powerful KO3s in the scene

He he Mylo don't say that you will be flamed lol

260bhp legend ;-)

mylo how powerful a ko3s????????????????

Oh dear maybe you are best doing some homework on R-Tech have you even heard of TIV+ mapping? No thought not.

No I have not, but have just read up and interesting stuff.....that explains the power curve well. Pretty dam good mapping their at R-Tech.

Awesome resultsmate

Such a smooth curve too, they certainly know their stuff these boys

The TiV is a map update for R-Tech customers, all maps from Nov 2012 will be our Gen17 base maps and will already carry the TiV mapping.

Its my new mappng methods for ME7 1.8T and MED9 2.0TFSI the results are amazing and allowing me to unlock the ecu more than ever before. I dont want to go into too much detail, but basically its a method I have been working on for 18months now which allows me to gain full control of the timing and boost and tune like a stand alone ecu with out over active PID or torque invertention. It removes lots of the stupid Bosch routines which hinder tuning for power. I am the only tuner offering this combination of tuning for 1.8T. TFSi and Focus 225 ST.. I wont be long until it gets copied like my linear throttle ideas...lol

source: What is tiv mapping

ooh like the sound of tiv mapping

R-tech are the nuts, I found there dyno to be bob on, Nic doesn't over inflate the figures only for people to be disappointed when their cars run on other dynos.

Found this from Nick also..

The reason for TIV

The anti-jerk function detects oscillations of the power train and damps them out by applying opposing-phase torque interventions. The torque intervention is converted into an ignition angle offset by the torque interface.

In order to damp the power train oscillation efficiently, the torque intervention should counteract engine speed oscillations. Thereby the same effect is achieved as if the attenuation coefficient of the drive shaft is increased.

You can have more power/ Performance but still have exact same peak bhp. Peak bhp is only a reading at 1rpm point to show where the max hp point is.

Performance tuning is about getting as much power from the whole power band. The more average bhp the quicker the car.

I would be happy having a car with 230bhp and 200bhp average over a car with 250bhp and 180bhp average.

2hp peak is nothing, it could be a cooler day, better fuel.

The TIV and TIV+ mapping is allowing us to unlock power from the whole of the torque curve its not aimed to get peak numbers. The TIV mapping also transforms the car on part throttle light load driving. At the moment we are the only company to offer this full TIV reduction mapping for ME9 - MED9 and ME7.5 ecus.

Too techi for me, but sounds impressive

mylo how powerful a ko3s????????????????

264.7 bhp proven on the infamous Badger5 dyno

Because race car.