Jump to content

1.4 16v tickover/idle rpm


Recommended Posts

Hello! 

Question for all you 1.4 16v owners out there; what RPM does your car idle at?

Mine sits at about 1,100 when it's started, but then once it's warm it sits at around 700, which seems a little low to me

Is this ordinary, and maybe for reducing emissions, or is it lower than it should be?

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

700 is indeed low, I think mine sits at about 850, a little higher when started from stone cold but only about 950, 1100 sounds high, I suspect you have a vacuum leak allowing additional air into the manifold bypassing the throttle body.

 

My reasoning is simple, when started from cold additional fuel is injected to richen the mixture to compensate for fuel droplet condensation on the cold port walls, the leak is allowing extra air to be burned with that fuel raising the fast idle speed above normal, once the engine is warm enough the ECU cuts the fuel right back to allow a lean burn, the additional air from the leak doesn't have any extra fuel to burn so the tickover is slower due to the even leaner mixture.

 

I expect your engine 'pinks' noticeably off idle as you accelerate under load.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow... thanks guys, very helpful posts just with opposite implications :D

Sepulchrave-i too suspected a vacuum leak would be the issue if indeed there was one, but my engine is indeed a BBZ so this table looks like it could be right. But just for general info, any suggestions where you would look for vacuum leaks? Somewhere between the throttle body and the intake manifold?

 

Wino-thanks for the table! Is it from a reliable source? If so it seems like i maybe don't have an issue after all

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's from an erWin document about Mk1 Fabias with those engine types.

I don't know of a more reliable source.

 

No problem with your idle speed.

 

Checking the brake servo vacuum pipe for cracking at all the pipe junctions is a very good idea anyway, if the car is new to you. :)

Edited by Wino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem.

If you can connect the car to VCDS, the Actual and Specified idling speed are found in Measuring block 50 of the engine module, fields 1 and 2 respectively.

Fields 3 and 4 tell you if the A/C system is on or off, and if A/C compressor is on or off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a problem with my engine running rough on idle, turned out to be a brake vac pipe problem as they seem to split by the one way valve

Check for any splits in it, I used some electrical tape over it to temporarily sort the problem

Might be something to check

 

IMG_0651.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, isambard said:

Wow... thanks guys, very helpful posts just with opposite implications :D

Sepulchrave-i too suspected a vacuum leak would be the issue if indeed there was one, but my engine is indeed a BBZ so this table looks like it could be right. But just for general info, any suggestions where you would look for vacuum leaks? Somewhere between the throttle body and the intake manifold?

 

Wino-thanks for the table! Is it from a reliable source? If so it seems like i maybe don't have an issue after all

 

 

 

Yes, mines an AUB, hence 850 RPM, but 1100 still sounds too high when cold so I'd definitely check for an air leak between the brake servo and the manifold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, so it is. No reason to assume that the different ECUs would have exactly the same cold-start strategy though.

 

I can't find any specs for either for cold start revs. Variable with coolant temperature, within limits, presumably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a deduction, ECU's are modular, they both share the same model number 4, revision letter has changed from L to M, the next letter in the alphabet, the engines are mechanically identical and therefore the basic pumping efficiency is unchanged, the only change worth noting is that the ignition module has been changed from 2 channels to 4 for the individual coil packs rather than the dual wasted spark pack on the AUB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems reasonable.

AUB higher tickover than AUA because of hotter cam/shifted-higher torque band of AUB??

Why is BBY/BKY versus BBZ the other way round? My BBY in the Polo idles at more like 680 than 760, so possibly the erWin data is wrong there?

Don't have the equivalent document with Polo at the top of it, but I guess I can see what VCDS says. Edit: found a log where at anything above 82C coolant temp, 678 is target idle rpm. Would it be different in Polo to Fabia? Can't think why right now?

 

Edited by Wino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come to think of it, when I look at that log, which is measuring block 53 amongst others, excel column D seems to be target rpm, which starts at 790 for a warm start at coolant temp 62C (column I).

Suggests that you can see target rpm for any given coolant temp in that second field of block 53.

If I remember, I'll plug in the laptop in the morning and see what it says at lower temps. :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log of measuring blocks 50 and 1, starting at 6C coolant temperature suggests 1200 rpm is as specified for idle speed for about the first 30 seconds on my Polo 9N, 2003, BBY engine.

It's even a little higher for the first 5 seconds. 

Will upload file later.

 

Here you go, various irrelevant data columns deleted from the spreadsheet, and a scaled version of coolant temperature so the plot (below the end of the data) can show it on the same scale as rpm.  Only ran the log for just under 2 minutes, will do a longer one tomorrow if I get a chance, to give more of a flavour of the coolant temp/cold start idle speed relationship.

Quite impressed by the closeness of fit between specified and actual rpm after the first 5 seconds.

 

Edited by Wino
Link to data/plot added
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies guys-although it got a bit technical there at the end!

I have checked the brake servo vacuum line as you all suggested and it seems to be ok

I drove the car A LOT over the weekend and the only other thing i noticed was that in crawling traffic the revs would often dip down to just above 500 before bouncing up to ~680

Does this sound ok or do i still need to be looking for a vacuum leak?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, isambard said:

Thanks for all the replies guys-although it got a bit technical there at the end!

I have checked the brake servo vacuum line as you all suggested and it seems to be ok

I drove the car A LOT over the weekend and the only other thing i noticed was that in crawling traffic the revs would often dip down to just above 500 before bouncing up to ~680

Does this sound ok or do i still need to be looking for a vacuum leak?

 

Do you mean when you're just sitting still waiting, foot off the go-pedal, or as you start to pull forward?

 

I find mine will drive itself without accelerator input, in traffic on a flat road; just dipping and raising the clutch as required to trickle forward with the queue. If you lift the clutch too abruptly it will make the revs dip as you describe.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Community Partner

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to BRISKODA. Please note the following important links Terms of Use. We have a comprehensive Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.