Jump to content

Cambelt Replacement


Avech37

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Apologies to all if this topic has been discussed on other threads but I am a newbie to this site..................

5 years ago, a Yeti TDI 170 Elegance was purchased for the wife. She is still over the moon about the car and I have to say, I like it very much as well. I am now at a point when I am told I have to have the cambelt replaced which I fully appreciate however, the car has travelled less than 10,000 miles!!

My question to you all is quite simply, should I replace the belt at such a low mileage? I appreciate all the arguments regarding belts degrading with time but what is the general opinion? I am led to believe that some recommendations originating from other European Skoda 'authorities' make reference to mileage only with no reference to a time based replacement trigger but I have no first hand evidence of this.

Any comments please?..............................and yes, I know less than 2k miles per annum is a bit extreme but that's how it is!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it’s all a bit of a gamble, the UK is as far as I know the only country to put a date on changing the belt, but rubber certainly does deteriorate over time so the question really is how lucky do you feel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Apologies to all if this topic has been discussed on other threads but I am a newbie to this site..................

5 years ago, a Yeti TDI 170 Elegance was purchased for the wife. She is still over the moon about the car and I have to say, I like it very much as well. I am now at a point when I am told I have to have the cambelt replaced which I fully appreciate however, the car has travelled less than 10,000 miles!!

My question to you all is quite simply, should I replace the belt at such a low mileage? I appreciate all the arguments regarding belts degrading with time but what is the general opinion? I am led to believe that some recommendations originating from other European Skoda 'authorities' make reference to mileage only with no reference to a time based replacement trigger but I have no first hand evidence of this.

Any comments please?..............................and yes, I know less than 2k miles per annum is a bit extreme but that's how it is!

 

If you don't replace it can you afford a new engine?

That is the risk you take.

Personally I'd replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a citroen Picasso, 1.6hdi, it was 10 years old with 120 k miles on the clock, when we sold it, the recommended belt change was 150 k miles, but sooner if short distances, as that is classed as harsh driving.

Of course we never changed it. I understood rightly or wrongly, that it was more mileage related than time. But that depends on the manufacturer.

We did a risk assessment, and since the car was old and not worth a great deal, we were able to take a chance.

A wrecked engine and we would have sent it to the scrap yard, no worries.

However with a young car with such a low mileage, you have to consider the cost going forward, and spread the cost over the next few years that you want to keep it.

So budget the cost going forward, over the next five years, then the price doesn't look that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention that you are already loosing approx. £3K + per year depreciation or a car so sit around being virtually unused,

so is £400 that much to bear for a replacement belt, pump and tensioners? (which will ‘last’ another 4 years)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Owned my 170 CR  Elegance from new, purchased Dec. 2009.  Changed Cambelt , water pump. tensioner and auxiliary belt at 32000mls last December. Cost £ 356 incl. labour. I inspected all parts replaced and could see no obvious signs of wear/cracking etc.  Garage owner works mainly on Taxi's and has never experienced a belt failure on a Skoda.  I endorse all of the comments posted which repeatedly warn of the consequences of gambling if it does fail.  Not worth the risk.  I also had to replace front discs (inner face badly corroded ) and pads at 32K which I thought was poor.  Garage showed me discs from a taxi that had worn out at 80K+ and was told my low mileage contributed to their early failure.

I know all the arguments against low annual diesel mileage ownership but like you enjoy the engine and feel good factor of seeing 50mpg on occasional long runs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Community Partner

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to BRISKODA. Please note the following important links Terms of Use. We have a comprehensive Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.