No really, I mean it. *cough*

The ultimate car accessory: Light-up dustcaps

Paul, these'll offset your neons just lovely

Oooh, they do look nice! Maybe I should get a set for the Fab. Oh no, they don't sem to do a colour to match Cayenne. Never mind. :( Guess I'll have to think of other idea's then!

Fluffy Dice?

If only they came in yellow ! (the tyre thingys, not fluffy dice - already have these on order !)

J

Looking at the size of those, could they not damage the valve or put the wheel out of balance.

I liked the ones they showed on Top Gear. Anyone see that?

tyre flys no thanks.. next thing youll have me driving a calibra!

We fit motorsport valves to deep dish road wheels so they don't flex and damage the wheel when in motion.

When I get my roof spoiler, boot spoiler, front & rear spoiler, motorsport sunstrip, badgeless grill, tinted windows, 300HP turbo engine, 18" alloys, then, maybe then, I'll think about getting some of those light-up dust-caps...

(they look crap! - and as pointed out above, must have wheel balancing effects)

Do you think that I should cancel my order then!

Its a personal feeling, John. That's all. All a bit too boy racer for a TDI Fabia.

That's why the demo car in the picture is an M3.

Or a 316 with a bodykit...

Not that there's anything wrong with 1.6 engines!

Rob.

Indeed, Rob. I could think of better things to do with my car with

Well, when you start looking at what else it could buy, it seems very bad value:

1. 14 pints of lager (up north)

2. A curry for 2 inc. poppadums.

3. 95 piece tool kit *AND* 53 piece precision toolkit.

4. 80 bars of Cadbury's Dairy Milk.

5. 2 months of unlimited internet acces with AOL.

6. Kenwood kettle and toaster pack with free water filter jug.

Plenty more I'm sure, but I think any one of these would make dust caps seem bad value...

Rob.

Originally posted by robmawer in this post

5. 2 months of unlimited internet acces with AOL.

The dust caps would be better value!!

Originally posted by robmawer in this post

Or a 316 with a bodykit...

Not that there's anything wrong with 1.6 engines!

Hey, don't diss the 316i! It's got a proper 1.8 engine!

some were 1.9?

Yeah, someone did try to explain to me that the 316 had a 1.9.

My response was something along the lines of "why didn't they call it a 319?"...

Rob.

Because it's slower than a 318i.

Which in itself is a 320i.

If it wasn't for that six-pot 320i, of course.

Factually, the 316i is 1746cc, so a 1.7, with 115 hp. (Would you want to pay that kind of money for 115 hp?) The 318i is 1995cc with 143 hp, which is pretty good for a n/a 4-cyl 2-litre.

Which is a 322i ...... thankfully at the 325 the madness stops!

Now it all makes perfect sense...

Rob.

So that's why they ditched the 323i.