Pirelli had the tyres so wrong!!  

 

Should have been soft and super soft

 

 

Always a tough call when you go to a circuit for the first time, but yes, in hindsight they got it massively wrong.

AUIU they didn't get to use their usual "track abrasiveness testing machine" on the track either. 

They had very little to go on, no access to track, no previous data, so had to just go with a gut feeling. Hopefully next year they will provide a much better tyre.

 

Elsewhere, Tilke has revealed some rendered images of the Azerbaijan street circuit which will host the 2016 European GP - it will apparently be the tightest and narrowest parts of any circuit, when a section cuts through the old town of Baku:

 

That does look tight, similar to racing round Macau. Maybe they'll have to have a no overtaking rule, although it'll be chaos if someone crashes in that section!

That does look tight, similar to racing round Macau. Maybe they'll have to have a no overtaking rule, although it'll be chaos if someone crashes in that section!

Perez would try it there

Whilst Maldonado will be stacking it there

Wow - that picture makes the circuit look very tight indeed.

 

I imagine this would be under review after the latest safety fiasco.

Yes, make it narrow, great idea, more processional racing... why not introduce some a goat here or there, just to spice things up!

Do we really want another street circuit in F1?

Monaco I can put up with, but the racing is usually dull, because it's difficult to overtake.

Yes, make it narrow, great idea, more processional racing... why not introduce some a goat here or there, just to spice things up!

Wouldn't that be the Pakistanii (curry) GP?

What does including Ross Brawn in this 10 man panel to investigate the Bianchi crash tell us?

 

Does it mean he is closer to an F1 return?

or that he

a) has time on his hands

 b )can be considered completely neutral due to lack of involvement with any current team

Looks like Caterham might have a few problems.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-29738116

In a world without sponsor backing/ nationality influencing driver choice, and ignoring distant past performances as justification for current contracts, who would you eliminate from the current F1 grid as "dead wood"?

 

I could happily cull the following without blinking: Raikkonen Massa Sutil Rosberg Maldonado and Chilton. I can't think of one occasion any of them have impressed or even surprised me this year. I think Grosjean, Vergne or Hulkenberg would be alot closer to Hamilton on pace than Rosberg is at present. Thoughts?

For instance, if I were Ferrari, and were offered 2005/ late 2007/ 2012 Raikkonen, i'd rip your hand off, but he has been dire this year. Surely there are non performance ties in his contract?

In a world without sponsor backing/ nationality influencing driver choice, and ignoring distant past performances as justification for current contracts, who would you eliminate from the current F1 grid as "dead wood"?

 

I could happily cull the following without blinking: Raikkonen Massa Sutil Rosberg Maldonado and Chilton. I can't think of one occasion any of them have impressed or even surprised me this year. I think Grosjean, Vergne or Hulkenberg would be alot closer to Hamilton on pace than Rosberg is at present. Thoughts?

 

Mostly agree, but Rosberg isn't that bad - more poles than Ham for a start and not just because of mechanical reasons. He's quick enough to keep Lewis pushing. Grosjean is fast, Vergne not quite.  Hulkenberg has completely missed his chance  - these days he rarely beats Perez, who's slower than Button, who never got near Hamilton on pace etc etc.

Ericsson - totally out of his depth at nearly every race this year

 

and 2007 kimi wasn't that great - he was given it!

 

some time in the future the truth will come about about how and why McLaren threw the titles away in the last 2 races.

Edited 23 October, 201411 yr by camelspyyder

Gutierrez - serial under-achiever only in place with big mexican sponsors

 

So since we've sacked off half the grid, who would you bring in from other series.

Edited 23 October, 201411 yr by camelspyyder

Perhaps Rosberg was harsh, although he needs a step change right now to challenge for the series on merit, which IMO won't happen. I was over the moon Massa returned to F1, but a contract for next year, based on this years performance? Really? And Jenson/ Vergne might be out of a drive at the same time? Scandalous.

Arguably, Gutierrez has matched the more experienced Sutil this year. Unfortunately, I cant see Sauber being around for much longer/ climbing off the foot of the table, so this problem should remove itself. I know its contentious, but without budget caps, a 3rd chassis for 7 teams would be a more competitive grid than the back three teams at present. I remember Ford's dominant 3 car team in the supertouring era of the BTCC #properracing

That ford team of 3 was the only works team left though.

 

In 94, there were something like 11 works or works-affiliated teams in BTCC -magic!

Perhaps Rosberg was harsh, although he needs a step change right now to challenge for the series on merit, which IMO won't happen. I was over the moon Massa returned to F1, but a contract for next year, based on this years performance? Really? And Jenson/ Vergne might be out of a drive at the same time? Scandalous.

 

I think Massa was signed on a multi-year deal already and he's up against a future superstar I reckon.

 

 

So next year we could promote which young drivers?

 

Indycars -    Simon Pagenaud

NASCAR -   Joey Logano

FR3.5 -       Carlos Sainz jr

GP2 -          Stoffel Vandoorne

LMP1 -        Brendon Hartley

 

some of these have got to be better than the dead wood.

Edited 23 October, 201411 yr by camelspyyder

I'd like to give Max C (and prior to his accident Jules) a better car and see exactly what they can do...  I think they have both done "ok" in a less than average car...

 

I'd cull:

 

Ericsson

Kobayashi 

Maldonado (safety car issue sorted)

Gutierrez

Raikonnen (Past his best)

JEV (tough one because he has done "okish" but not enough for me)

Looks like Caterham might have a few problems.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-29738116

So getting "the rent we think the site is worth" is more important than 200 jobs then? Is there anyone reading this who can withdraw some business from Smith Williamson?

Max C?

 

Without Daddy's millions he wouldn't have a sniff of an F1 drive, come to that his brother wouldn't be in WTCC either.

 

If I'm being nice - he's better than Ericsson (see above)

Edited 23 October, 201411 yr by camelspyyder

Arguably, Gutierrez has matched the more experienced Sutil this year. Unfortunately, I cant see Sauber being around for much longer/ climbing off the foot of the table, so this problem should remove itself. I know its contentious, but without budget caps, a 3rd chassis for 7 teams would be a more competitive grid than the back three teams at present. I remember Ford's dominant 3 car team in the supertouring era of the BTCC #properracing

 

Hmmm. that is just so bad for Sutil.  Gutierrez is known to be slow and Sutil can't beat him - they've both got to go!