Skip to content

First Shark PUBLIC Remap of the 1.6 TDI CR

Featured Replies

no he really did, the vrs does the 0-62 sprint in 7.3 seconds the monte 105bhp does it in 10.2, mines remapped to 133 on sharks dyno with masses of increased torque, so you can knock at least a second off it maybe 2 which means in a line to 60, its not far behind (on the clock) and imo with no clock, it would surely feel as fast?

So what the skoda guy was saying, imo is right?

either way, if im a second and a half behind a vrs, doing 55mpg, paying £205 a year fully comp and paying £20 a year road tax im happy :-) But i still have a dirty diesel with no race heritage when i think about it hard enough lol.

Hi,I have vrs mark 2 cthe and it does 0-60 in 6 seconds,I have done various tests (mine is standard)
  • Replies 167
  • Views 29.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • dont just look at peak torque. peak figures dont mean anything. Its the amount of area below the power/torque curves which equate to a faster car, that area is what matters and petrol engine has tha

  • Remap my monte was best mod so far! Drives brilliantly and still good on fuel.

  • Monte Carlo looks awesome in yellow and black!

Posted Images

Hi,I have vrs mark 2 cthe and it does 0-60 in 6 seconds,I have done various tests (mine is standard)

6 flat.......really?

leobella,  really 0-60 in 6 seconds with a standard car?  

Others must use the extra 0.5-0.8 seconds or so to get to the extra 2 mph & to 0-62 (100 km)

 

What timing / test system are you using?

Edited by goneoffSKi

To be fair to him,

 

My old CAVE engine car with the TMC box on level 7, ITG induction kit, warm tyres and low (Next to no) fuel in the tank would be able to pull low 6 second 0-60's.

 

The conditions had to be right though.

To be fair to him,

My old CAVE engine car with the TMC box on level 7, ITG induction kit, warm tyres and low (Next to no) fuel in the tank would be able to pull low 6 second 0-60's.

The conditions had to be right though.

Exactly, with a TMC box.....he's saying completely standard, so presumably with a box his would be doing 5s, which is pretty much junior supercar territory

Ha!

 

Yes if it's a standard car, I find it hard to believe he can hit 0-60 in 6 seconds.

Mine would probably do 7.5-8 (If i hated my clutch) so a sub 6sec sounds a little optimistic  :notme:

Mine would probably do 7.5-8 (If i hated my clutch) so a sub 6sec sounds a little optimistic :notme:

He's talking about the petrol vRS, Darryl

Not quite sure why on a 1.6 diesel thread, but still

The DSG is fantastic and probably gives you 1 second from 0-60 compared to a competent driver in a manual car of similar power and weight.

 

If he has the CTHE engine running similar power to a CAVE on a TMC box (Circa 200bhp) maybe low 6 seconds are possible....

 

Sorry for going off topic in a 1.6tdi thread! :x

I find some of the 0-60 claims fantastic , adding 20hp to a 1.2 tonne car won't knock 1 second off the time

I find some of the 0-60 claims fantastic , adding 20hp to a 1.2 tonne car won't knock 1 second off the time

 

 

That's assuming you pay attention to Skoda's claimed 0-62 which was always played very safe.

 

My old car was up by 30bhp over stock and had sticky front tyres on. :-) it's not just bhp the tuning box ups, its midrange torque which helps massively.

That's assuming you pay attention to Skoda's claimed 0-62 which was always played very safe.

 

My old car was up by 30bhp over stock and had sticky front tyres on. :-) it's not just bhp the tuning box ups, its midrange torque which helps massively.

You have to wonder why they played it safe on the VRS and no other models

 

Midrange torque does help but in a 0-60 sprint you are only in the midrange once, in 1st where its hard to even use full throttle

I guess it may be down to the same basic drivetrain and power plant being used over 3 different VAG warm hatches?

 

Wonder if the Polo GTI had the same stated 0-62 time as the Fabia?

 

Well in theory yes, I found to get the best getaway was to short shift into 2nd, therefore you are in the mid-range twice. Once you're not traction limited, you're off! 

Full throttle + midrange once ;)

 

The flagship A1 was quoted with a 6.9s 0-60 although plenty on here reckon theirs is quicker stock , I have my doubts,  and I also have my doubts a few bolt on's will knock even 9/10th of a second off

Full throttle + midrange once ;)

 

 

Maybe that's why you've never got close to a 6 second 0-60? ;)

Maybe that's why you've never got close to a 6 second 0-60? ;)

my best 0-60 is 1.29 seconds :)

 

You cant get full throttle in 1st without spinning so as you say you shift into 2nd and floor it , after 2nd the revs dont drop into the midrange again :)

Well they are not giving times quicker than the more expensive VW,Audi ,Seat sister cars with the same engines, gearbox, but 215 tyres, and which are heavier. But then the heavier estate is also given a quicker time than the hatch. Thing there is it is quicker as standard due to front end grip and lighter than a 5 door VW with the same engine, even with a spare wheel fitted. VW engineering of figures. The sister cars are even a lower tax class.????

Edited by goneoffSKi

So off topic on the 1.6 TDI CR 105PS MINIMUM REMAPPING, which gives 130ps easy. For the Skoda Twinchargers just fit the same size tyres as the sister cars, remove the spare wheel and on the hatch the rear success ballast and you have the lightest of the 5 vehicles and surely the performance figures are equally as good or better than the other 132-136kw Twinchargers.

6 flat.......really?[/quote

6 flat yes(standard vrs cthe mark 2 and only use tesco 99 fuel and traction control off which makes a big difference)very happy(even girlfriend does 6.5 and she is a newish driver).

6 flat.......really?[/quote

6 flat yes(standard vrs cthe mark 2 and only use tesco 99 fuel and traction control off which makes a big difference)very happy(even girlfriend does 6.5 and she is a newish driver).

 

 

And the recording equipment is?

 

Last comment on the matter since it's totally irrelevant to a 1.6 TDi thread

Dual post due to slow connection  :( 

Maybe that's why you've never got close to a 6 second 0-60? ;)

 

What about 0-56mph allowing for Speedo error? :)

What about 0-56mph allowing for Speedo error? :)

 

 

Thanks Richard!

 

You've just rendered this whole past discussion even more pointless than it already was! :D

And the recording equipment is?

A casio nailed to the dash ??

A casio nailed to the dash ??

 

Isn't that the most accurate form, whilst glancing at the speedo out of the corner of your eye?

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

Welcome to BRISKODA. Please note the following important links Terms of Use. We have a comprehensive Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.