travs

Just some examples to back-up. Not upset by the way, just trying to bring your behaviour to your attention. However, you've now disparaged the forum a couple of times. Its not a fraternity, there are plenty of opinions and deliveries, but its nothing to do with the guys that setup and run the forum at their own personal time and effort. I don't think they deserve to have their work tainted in that way.

Yes everybody should be doing it but you don't. I don't care if you want to call someone out to verify - but you've got to hold yourself to the same standard or you risk being called out on it. I don't want to see anything in particular, but Its preventive maintenance - the tangible benefit is the absence of something going wrong later on. You pays your money, you takes your choice. I'm not wanting to see anything in particular, I've always just pointed out the double-standard of questioning other people's posts while not offering the same level of detail or scrutiny. Although I do note you quote this forum as a source and yet when I search for "VAQ and Servicing" I only see posts talking about servicing and just spotted this Bobby Dazzler or this one from the same topic.

Profile, Account Settings, Security and Privacy, enter password to reauthenticate, account deletion is bottom right. Best of luck

All I've read is asking for others to quote sources, yet just being non-descript about what you've heard from who or what. Occy's added links, quoted sources and explained stuff in detail - in part because you've asked, but in part he's proactively offered this information. I still don't see that reciprocated. This is just bonkers. What's an aggressive schedule? Too much maintenance? That flies in the face of logic. From the vehicle's point of view, there's only one way you can mess up maintenance and that's not doing it enough. Given the allusion that independents advising servicing are money-making, you're giving the impression cost is more important than maintenance.

Tensions have been raised a little but personally I've not found Briskoda any different to other car forums I've been on. Which isn't a million of them, but enough for me to be happy with my own conclusions on likely custom and practise. As usual, it'll come down to interpretation and language. Occy is very detail-orientated. Not always right and he defers to greater powers but he does his research where he can. Admittedly some of the stuff he's said in his last posts weren't in his first, that's just come out in the conversation. I've not contributed much in the way of technical know-how but I've sought to get into the approximations and allusions. Can't go insinuating independents are trying to con customers (a reasonable interpretation of your money-making statement) without backing it up. In the same way you've repeatedly questioned other's sources whilst simultaneously saying you've read stuff in "multiple places". Or saying you thought Skoda were quoting as a lifetime sealed and then say "as far as Skoda sources go, I haven't found it mentioned". Tbh it reads far more like facebook commenting than an owners forum - the former is all attempts at gotcha questions and lol emojis when arguing, the latter is much more based on fact and owner's enthusiasm.

Either way - aside from unnecessary alluding to independents somehow with a conflict of interest that dealers somehow don’t have, owners lose nothing mechanically by beating any official advice on servicing and maintenance if you’re looking to keep the car and take care of it for the long haul. @Catzeye unfortunately it looks as though this car may not have been one of those.

What an odd-thing to say in this thread; what makes you come out with that off-topic?

Under the impression? Usually? Or told definitely by multiple dealers and Skoda UK? Can't see anything that says they're lifetime on the internet.

Yeah Peter Schmeichel and his son would hardly fit at all.

Potential to do list: Alu subframe and LCAs Uprated 380mm front brakes and 4pots Either Stage 2 - likely Trackslag downpipe with 200cell cat and additional silencer in pace of GPF. Or This APR Stage 3 standard GPF option Would love to see if Raclingline do an alternative to this but can't see anything yet.

Yep complete sense. Plug-in boxes can only tweak so much whereas a more comprehensive setup makes everything work together better I think and much more driveable makes for a much better experience and less strain on ancillary parts. Mine is Gen4, of which the major difference is bigger turbo. On an unproven 430bhp at present on Stage 1+ but it was impressive how effective the uprated IC and pipework was (WT IC and their pipes/hoses from turbo-to-IC-to-throttle body) - despite a smaller pub-stat gain, it was much more noticeable throughout the driveability of the car. My dilemma with GPF - replace with a fast-cell downpipe and GPF removal (and hope Mr MOT man doesn't spot) or APR have come up with a Stage 3 which keeps standard downpipe. Emissions/legality stays in check for certain states in USA and UK obvs. Also keeps sound to standard which is fine with the family car for now. It wont realise the full potential of the setup given the standard downpipe but the guys at the Phirm mooted it as an option too.

Very strong torque figure. Is that a pre-GPF?

Its not to turn you off being an enthusisiast - just that you'll have limited bang for buck so might as well go for something more responsive to tuning anyway.

Fairly sure it is a straight swap - but if its twisted slightly, what's the effect, just mounting points slightly out of place? Or does it affect steering geometry/tracking? Someone else on here fitted alu LCAs and thought they were better for some reason...but it might depend on what vehicle it came from. I think his were from Audi TTS but there might be tolerance differences with Golf 7 R, 8P S3 etc. etc. Here it is - Lower Control Arms

Lovely job. Open window, foot down at lower revs is when I really noticed the engine sucking on the air. As the revs rise you lose most of the sound I feel. But I'm fine with that. Subtle rules over everything. 2 things - keep an eye on the coolant hose at the engine block end for weeping. Mine did and a mech noticed it and tightened it. Also, keep an eye on whether the bottom corner of the engine cover rubs on the hose. it might not given yours is a Gen3 and mine is Gen4 but just to put it on the radar.

Nice - alu subframe and lower control arms are on my distant radar. Is there a risk that its crash damaged and not straight/true?

Just as a classic gremlin check - how’s the battery?

Definitely VCDS but also OBD11 and I think I’ve read Carista too. The big pity about the Monroe seems to be build quality. I had a front start to leak at about 28k miles/4 years.

The Monroe one? Autodoc seems to have it down as the correct part. Pretty sure no coding is needed through VCDS. Only thing that will be needed is calibration. Get the car up in the air, let the wheels hang free (and suggest keeping the wheels on to make sure the shock absorber is extended and then run the calibration process so the controller understands the extremity of shock absorber travel.

Shame it’s being swapped out. The DNFE engine is amazing as it is and brilliant for breathing on. What’s the replacement Dave? Are the wheels being sold too?

Looks good @Binx1310 - the only downside of mine is blacking out just would look too much for me and needs something to accent. I was wondering about a brushed-aluminium colour but I'd have to see in time.

Superb. End of.

I've had my eye on the Racingline version (obvs) - all for preventive measures. Look neat and tidy. Is it fiddly? Do you end up losing much coolant?

Interesting - so changing the physical part changes the long-coding and you had to make sure it was the same as what it had been?

It clicks once when the weight shifts forward? Or clicks in time with the rotation of the wheel? Sounds like the brakes have been ruled out.