Hybrids are bad, because they tow around a lot of weight when for many journeys they are not taking advantage of the weight.
300kg extra on batteries that affects range from power, on ICE it affects range/MPG on both it affects performance.
Charging wise, they are bad when they are sat at a charger bay for hours, idle.
A 15 minute charge, or plugging them in when every parking bay has a 10-32Amp charge point is a different matter.
Right now they are harming EV adoption, because the infrastructure isn't there and the stuff that is around is very often blocked off by them.
The second point is more related to the fact that they shouldn't be sat idle or in charging bays for hours and hours, which they often are here.
That is a bonus and the plan here, but not being able to get home, because you can't charge your EV because a hybrid has blocked the charger bay (Even though they were full in less than an hour). Again it's really down to poor infrastructure for electrification.
I think the price of batteries may change the course of electrification, but current hybrids are just ICE cars with a load of weight and parts to get a little distance on electric, which as mentioned elsewhere isn't always green.
I can respect a 1.5 choice, I can respect somebody going EV, the hybrid route makes no sense to me.
At least the plugin hybrids have some plus points, the self charging ones are a joke.
I understand it and I've not got a problem with it.
I think hearing how great a PHEV is reminds me very much of when I worked with somebody who owned one of the early prius. They were all sanctamonius about how great his MPG was and how the car was amazing. The talk was about how they could get 45-50MPG on a good run, whilst at the same time we were all seeing way over that in the diesels even on a bad run.
Fundamentally the advantage of a PHEV is really with the car manufacturer.
They charge more, use a smaller engine and a battery, which gives a lower official (But rarely real world) emissions figure.
This helps them avoid EU fines and allows them to get higher performance from a smaller engine.
It's good, but it's not green. Nothing is zero emissions.
My argument is that if people are doing low enough PHEV miles to always be on battery, they should have just gone EV and hired ICE when they needed to go over 250-300 miles. If they're regularly doing longer journeys, then the weight penalty is always there and after the first 20-30 miles your MPG suffers for it. At which point a TDI or TSI is a better bet. The hybrid might be a nice idea, but in reality having both engine and transmission as well as battery and motor is a huge weight penalty. In reality you would better off doing a range extender (i3 Rx) so the engine never drives the wheels, which would save loads of weight in transmission and a smaller engine as a generator only. You could also swap petrol for CNG or Autogas etc and have a less heavy generator.
Really as above, I think the current and previous generation of PHEV, bar a small number (i3 Rx) are greenwashing.
The choice is fine, but the PHEV shouldn't receive tax breaks for being green.