Sold my MK3 a few months back, will most probably be my last Skoda, nothing in the current range makes me think oooh I want of them.
Originally had a 2002 MK1 VRS which I had for 12 years. My 2019 MK3.5 I kept for 18 months. On comparing the two variants to me they both have their good and bad points.
I kept my MK1 standard for around 3 years, then found this site and the mods started, MK3 was left standard, mods were planned but the itch to get a V8 won so the VRS went and in came Jag XFR.
So on to comparing the VRS's.
MK3 has the better chassis handles better than MK1, ride quality the same.
MK3 definitely has the better seats, much more support and a lot easier to keep clean along with the carpets, who thought white/silver seats and carpet in a family car was a good idea I'll never know.
MK1 has the better steering wheel to the touch, MK3 feels to plasticky, design is on a par. Some of the interior plastics on the MK3 seemed a bit more scratchy and hard compared to the MK1.
MK3 has the better spec all round.
MK3 why are the front window switches hidden behind the door handle?? I opened the rears nearly as much as the fronts.
MK1 opening the boot in the rain resulted in water in the boot, nice to see they cured it for the MK3. Both have great boot space.
The engines, 2.0TSi and 1.8T 20V, newer engine the better performance wise, both very tunable, and both have decent reliability if properly maintained. Think my biggest gripe with the 2.0 TSi is how many parts under the bonnet are now plastic, and we all know how plastic copes with numerous heat cycles, think I'd of been waiting for something to split once things get hot after a few years of use.
MK3 headlamps loads better than the candles on the MK1.
Fuel economy on a run was good on both models, I regularly got mid 40's, and insurance was was good compered to some of it's rivals.
Both good looking cars, MK1 wins this one for me just looked better compared to lower spec models, where as the MK3 doesn't look different enough to the rest of the range. never bothered with the MK2 or MK2 FL, didn't like the back end and the Dame Edna glasses on the FL. The MK4 leaves me cold, looks like a bad copy BMW 3 series.
So which do I think is the better of the two?
For me it's the MK1, it's a close call, the MK1 just seems to have a character to it where the the MK3 feels a little to clinical. Both cars based on Golf GTi, the MK1 to me felt on a par to the MK4 GTi, where as the MK3 feels cheaper than GTi's now, VAG management definitely put a gap between Audi, VW, and Skoda, Seat taking up the cheap end.
Another to way to look at it also is when you park your car, do you look back at your car and think that's mine, I did with the MK1 all the time, the MK3 not so much.
Anyway that's my thoughts and opinion, let the agreements and disagreements start🤣🤣