Yep.
Pretty much the same thing, IMO.
Ah ha! This is the money-shot.
The whole idea of "consensus" is (IMO quite a feminine) perversion of science.
Scientists don't care about consensus. Consensus is for women, soy-boys and deciding where the lads are going for a drink tonight.
Any "science" that leans on consensus is not science.
Unfortunately, your whole case rests on an artificial consensus, which is pushed by people with vested interests in pushing the "green" agenda.
(It was the same with the COVID-19 vaccines, IMO. The "consensus" on the benefits of the vaccine did not represent the reality of the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines.
Some of most ardent vaccine enthusiasts stopped at three shots and said "Now hang on a minute...".)
All scientists have incentives and disincentives to push the Climate Change agenda.
You want a load of funding from "green" groups and/or Governments? Tell them you're studying the effects of "climate change" on <whatever you like> and the money will flow.
Hat-tip to @Graham Butcher at this point.
Wyx, now you're being disingenuous. The data is as presented on the website.
Framing it as "EnterName's Data" vs "Truth" is getting into Clique territory of dishonesty, and I notice they have shown their approval of some of your posts.
I literally cut and paste the graph from the website. It's not MY data, it's THE data as provided by that source.
Haven't watched the video but I agree, there are way too many ideologues who think they can control everything better than just letting people trade freely.
Whoa! Now this is quite a pivot from Captain Consensus, isn't it? 🤨
Suddenly you don't GAF about consensus, who cares about people's opinions!?
INB4 "You're putting words in my mouth!" No. I'm not putting words in your mouth, I'm re-framing what you said to highlight the logical inconsistencies in your argument.
LOL I missed this off my list of cliches.
In return I offer: Let's be clear, Climate Change is more about wealth redistribution from developed countries to developing countries than any immediate threat to the planet. How's that for a fact?
Yes, which is why I want the smallest Government possible.
The less they can get their hands on to mess up for the rest of us, the better IMO.
Your urge to tell people what to do and your desire to change laws to force them to do it if they don't comply drips from almost every post.
I can just see you at the exit to Sainsbury's trying to tell people they have bought the "wrong" shopping, with "facts" and "data" to back up why they should have bought X instead of Y, which is killing people in Africa!!!!!! 😄